Navajo Nation v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Company et al

Filing 25

ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the Navajo Nation's unopposed motion to enter the proposed consent decree (Doc. 23 ) is GRANTED. The consent decree will be entered as a separate document. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge Douglas L Rayes on 5/19/17.(SLQ)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Navajo Nation, No. CV-17-08007-PHX-DLR Plaintiff, 10 11 v. 12 Cyprus Amax Minerals Company; and Western Nuclear, Inc., (Related Case No. CV-17-00140-PHX-DLR) 13 14 ORDER Defendants. 15 16 17 The Navajo Nation commenced this action by filing a complaint against 18 Defendants Cyprus Amax Minerals Company and Western Nuclear, Inc. on January 17, 19 2017. (Doc. 1.) The same day, the United States filed a similar suit against Defendants, 20 Case No. CV-17-00140-PHX. The two cases arise from Defendants' mining activities on 21 Navajo Nation land and recovery of environmental response costs and injunctive relief 22 under CERCLA. 23 approved, would resolve the claims in both cases. (See Doc. 4.) The parties have agreed to a proposed consent decree which, if 24 Before the Court is the Navajo Nation's unopposed motion to enter the proposed 25 consent decree (Doc. 23), which was lodged by the United States in the related case (Doc. 26 18-6, No. CV-17-00140-PHX). Having reviewed the consent decree, the Court finds it to 27 be fair, reasonable, and consistent with the objectives of CERCLA. The Court therefore 28 grants the Navajo Nation's unopposed motion to enter the consent decree. 1 IT IS ORDERED that the Navajo Nation's unopposed motion to enter the 2 proposed consent decree (Doc. 23) is GRANTED. The consent decree will be entered as 3 a separate document. 4 Dated this 19th day of May, 2017. 5 6 7 8 9 Douglas L. Rayes United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?