Montiel-Guarda v. USA

Filing 12

ORDER - Adopting in whole the R&R prepared by Judge Boyle (Doc. 11 ) and denying as untimely the Motion to Correct his Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (Doc. 1 ) The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment and close this matter. IT IS FURT HER ORDERED denying a Certificate of Appealability because Defendant has made no substantial showing that reasonable jurists would find the District Courts assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 02/12/2018. (KAS)

Download PDF
1 NOT FOR PUBLICATION 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Felipe Montiel-Guarda, Petitioner, 10 11 ORDER v. 12 No. CV-17-08083-PCT-JJT (JZB) USA, 13 Respondent. 14 15 At issue is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) prepared in this matter by 16 United States Magistrate Judge John Z. Boyle (Doc. 11) analyzing the pleadings and 17 recommending that the Court deny as untimely Mr. Montiel-Guarda’s Motion to Correct 18 his Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (Doc. 1.) The time to object to the R&R has 19 passed and Movant has filed no objections. The Court thus may accept the R&R without 20 further review per United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). It 21 nonetheless chooses to review the R&R on the merits and, upon doing so, concludes the 22 analysis therein is correct. 23 The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed Movant’s direct appeal, upon his 24 motion, on August 31, 2015. From that date, Movant had one year, or until September 1, 25 2016, to file his 2255 motion, absent any tolling. Movant has provided no basis for tolling 26 the deadline, as Judge Boyle correctly found. Movant filed his Motion on May 1, 2017— 27 eight months too late. 28 1 IT IS ORDERED adopting in whole the R&R prepared by Judge Boyle (Doc. 11.) 2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as untimely the Motion to Correct his 3 Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (Doc. 1.) The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment 4 and close this matter. 5 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying a Certificate of Appealability because 6 Defendant has made no substantial showing that reasonable jurists would find the District 7 Court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. 8 Dated this 12th day of February, 2018. 9 10 11 Honorable John J. Tuchi United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?