Montiel-Guarda v. USA
Filing
12
ORDER - Adopting in whole the R&R prepared by Judge Boyle (Doc. 11 ) and denying as untimely the Motion to Correct his Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (Doc. 1 ) The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment and close this matter. IT IS FURT HER ORDERED denying a Certificate of Appealability because Defendant has made no substantial showing that reasonable jurists would find the District Courts assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 02/12/2018. (KAS)
1
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Felipe Montiel-Guarda,
Petitioner,
10
11
ORDER
v.
12
No. CV-17-08083-PCT-JJT (JZB)
USA,
13
Respondent.
14
15
At issue is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) prepared in this matter by
16
United States Magistrate Judge John Z. Boyle (Doc. 11) analyzing the pleadings and
17
recommending that the Court deny as untimely Mr. Montiel-Guarda’s Motion to Correct
18
his Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (Doc. 1.) The time to object to the R&R has
19
passed and Movant has filed no objections. The Court thus may accept the R&R without
20
further review per United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). It
21
nonetheless chooses to review the R&R on the merits and, upon doing so, concludes the
22
analysis therein is correct.
23
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed Movant’s direct appeal, upon his
24
motion, on August 31, 2015. From that date, Movant had one year, or until September 1,
25
2016, to file his 2255 motion, absent any tolling. Movant has provided no basis for tolling
26
the deadline, as Judge Boyle correctly found. Movant filed his Motion on May 1, 2017—
27
eight months too late.
28
1
IT IS ORDERED adopting in whole the R&R prepared by Judge Boyle (Doc. 11.)
2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as untimely the Motion to Correct his
3
Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (Doc. 1.) The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment
4
and close this matter.
5
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying a Certificate of Appealability because
6
Defendant has made no substantial showing that reasonable jurists would find the District
7
Court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong.
8
Dated this 12th day of February, 2018.
9
10
11
Honorable John J. Tuchi
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?