Davis et al v. Aramark Corporation et al
Filing
15
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that, the Court has reviewed the supplement to the notice of removal (Doc. 14 ) and finds jurisdiction to have been alleged. Thus, the Court will take no further action regarding jurisdiction, without prejudice to Plaintiffs raising any jurisdictional issues they deem appropriate. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 8/28/17. (MAW)
<![CDATA[
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Gayla Davis and Rodney Davis,
Plaintiffs,
10
11
ORDER
v.
12
No. CV-17-08154-PCT-JAT
Aramark Corporation and Aramark Sports
and Entertainment Services LLC,
13
14
Defendants.
15
IT IS ORDERED that, the Court has reviewed the supplement to the notice of
16
removal (Doc. 14) and finds jurisdiction to have been alleged. Thus, the Court will take
17
no further action regarding jurisdiction, without prejudice to Plaintiffs raising any
18
jurisdictional issues they deem appropriate.
19
Dated this 28th day of August, 2017.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
