Gill et al v. Aramark Sports and Entertainment Services LLC et al
Filing
26
ORDER - Defendant United States of America is dismissed from this action. Signed by Judge Susan M Brnovich on 9/3/21. (DXD)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Michael Gill, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
10
11
ORDER
v.
12
No. CV-20-08321-PCT-SMB
Aramark Sports and Entertainment Services
LLC, et al.,
13
14
Defendants.
15
By this order the Court takes up the issue of Plaintiff’s service on the Defendant
16
United States of America. On December 1, 2020, Plaintiff brought this action against the
17
United States and against Aramark Sports and Entertainment Services LLC. (Doc. 1.) On
18
December 2, 2020, the Court issued an order directing the clerk of Court to terminate any
19
Defendants in the matter that were not served by March 1, 2021. (Doc. 7.) Pursuant to that
20
order, the Clerk of Court terminated the United States as a Defendant on March 3, 2021
21
because Plaintiff had not filed an affidavit of service. (Doc. 14.) Plaintiff immediately filed
22
a Motion for Reconsideration and to Reinstate Defendant USA, (Doc. 15), explaining that
23
an independent process servicer provider hired by the Plaintiff had served the United States
24
on December 7, 2020. (Doc. 15.) Plaintiff informed the Court that it was a simpler error
25
and oversite on their part which resulted in the affidavit of service not being filed. (Id.) The
26
Court then reinstated the United States as a Defendant. (Doc. 16.)
27
However, after reinstatement Plaintiff still never filed any notice of service with the
28
Court. The sole proof of service appears in an affidavit filed as an exhibit to Plaintiff’s
1
Motion to Reconsider. (Doc. 15.) Further, even if the affidavit were filed with the Court,
2
service would still be incomplete. According to the affidavit, the only action taken by the
3
process server was to mail a copy of the summons and complaint to the Attorney General
4
of the United States in Washington D.C. (Doc. 15-1 at 2.) But as the Federal Rules of Civil
5
Procedure clearly state:
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
[T]o serve the United States a party must:
(A)
(i) deliver a copy of the summons and of the complaint to the United
States attorney for the district where the action is brought —or to an
assistant United States attorney or clerical employee whom the United
States attorney designates in a writing filed with the court clerk—or
(ii) send a copy of each by registered or certified mail to the civilprocess clerk at the United States attorney’s office;
(B) send a copy of each by registered or certified mail to the Attorney General
of the United States at Washington, D.C.; and
C) if the action challenges an order of a nonparty agency or officer of the
United States, send a copy of each by registered or certified mail to the
agency or officer.
16
Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i)(1). The rule’s use of “and” indicates the requirements of (A), (B), and
17
(C) form a conjunctive rather than a disjunctive list. See, e.g., United States v. Lopez, 998
18
F.3d 431 (9th Cir. 2021) (“not only is the plain meaning of ‘and’ conjunctive, but the
19
Senate's own legislative drafting manual tells the court that ‘and’ is used as a
20
conjunctive.”); United States v. Myers, 878 F.2d 1142, 1144 (9th Cir. 1989). Here, while
21
the Plaintiff’s affidavit indicates they have “sent a copy…by registered or certified mail to
22
the Attorney General of the United States at Washington, D.C” as required by
23
Rule(4)(i)(1)(B), the affidavit does not indicate whether Plaintiff has “delivered a copy of
24
the summons and of the complaint to the United States attorney for the district where the
25
action is brought…” as required under Rule(4)(i)(1)(A). Because the Plaintiff must satisfy
26
both Rule(4)(i)(1)(B) and Rule(4)(i)(1)(A) in order to serve the United States, service has
27
not been shown by Plaintiff’s affidavit.
28
Accordingly,
-2-
1
2
3
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant United States of America is dismissed from this
action.
Dated this 3rd day of September, 2021.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?