Miles, et al v. Stewart

Filing 93

ORDER granting 92 Motion Renewed Motion for Authorization of Federal Habeas Counsel to Appear in State Court Litigation. Federally-appointed counsel is authorized to represent Petitioner in state court for the purpose of seeking state post-conviction relief under Rule 32 of the Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure. Signed by Chief Judge Raner C Collins on 11/5/13.(SMBE)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 9 Kevin Artice Miles, 10 11 Petitioner, v. 12 13 Charles L. Ryan, Respondent. 14 15 ) No. CV-01-00645-TUC-RCC ) ) DEATH PENALTY CASE ) ) ) ) ORDER ) ) ) ) ) 16 Before the Court is Petitioner’s renewed motion for authorization of federal habeas 17 counsel to appear in state court litigation. (Doc. 92.) Based on the information provided 18 therein, the Court finds good cause to permit Petitioner’s federally-appointed counsel to 19 represent him in a successive state post-conviction proceeding under Rule 32 of the Arizona 20 Rules of Criminal Procedure. See 18 U.S.C. § 3599(e); Harbison v. Bell, 556 U.S. 180, 190 21 n.7 (2009). 22 Accordingly, 23 IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s Renewed Motion for Authorization of Federal 24 Habeas Counsel to Appear in State Court Litigation (Doc. 92) is GRANTED. In addition 25 to clemency-related proceedings, federally-appointed counsel is authorized to represent 26 Petitioner in state court for the purpose of seeking state post-conviction relief under Rule 32 27 of the Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure. By issuance of this order, the Court does not 28 1 purport to encourage, approve, or convey any position with respect to the merits of the 2 proposed litigation. 3 DATED this 5th day of November, 2013. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?