Sapp v. Blair, et al
Filing
29
*ORDER ADOPTING 25 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus : Recommending that Dismiss the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Motions terminated: 28 MOTION for Disposition and Final Decision Order. Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED, Judgement to be entered accordingly. Signed by Senior Judge Frank R Zapata on 9/14/11. (SMBE) Modified on 9/15/2011 to correct typo (enteren to entered) (SMBE).*
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Steven L. Sapp,
Petitioner,
10
11
vs.
12
Charles Ryan, et al.,
13
Respondents.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV 05-050-TUC-FRZ
ORDER
14
15
16
Before the Court for consideration is the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant
17
to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 filed by Petitioner Steven L. Sapp in this action and the Report and
18
Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, recommending the dismissal of the Petition.
19
This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge D. Thomas Ferraro pursuant to Rules
20
72.1 and 72.2 of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure for further proceedings and report and
21
recommendation.
22
Magistrate Judge Ferraro issued his Report and Recommendation, recommending that
23
the Court enter an order denying the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and dismissing this
24
action in its entirely as untimely under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of
25
1996, 28 U.S.C. § 22543(d)(“AEDPA”), based on Petitioner’s failure to establish entitlement
26
of statutory or equitable tolling.
27
28
The Report and Recommendation sets forth the factual and procedural history of
Petitioner’s state court proceedings and the conviction at issue.
1
Petitioner seeks review on 12 separate grounds of his conviction in Cochise County
2
Superior Court of Arizona, case number CR–98000325, in which Petitioner was convicted
3
by jury on March 24, 1999 of (1) possession for sale of a dangerous drug
4
(methamphetamine), a class 2 felony; (2) possession of drug paraphernalia, a class 6 felony;
5
and (3) driving on a suspended license, a class 1 misdemeanor, all which occurred on July
6
6, 1998.
7
Based on a prior conviction, Petitioner was sentenced on June 14, 1999 to a nine-year-
8
three-month prison term on the drug possession charge, a concurrent 1one year and nine
9
months on the paraphernalia possession charge. He also received a consecutive one year
10
probation term on the misdemeanor charge.
11
As set forth in detail in the Report and Recommendation, Petitioner has not
12
demonstrated that an extraordinary circumstance prevented him from timely filing, and
13
therefore, Petitioner failed to reach the high threshold to establish entitlement to statutory or
14
equitable tolling.
15
Petitioner filed his objections to the Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28
16
U.S.C. §636(b), arguing both that the present petition and accompanying habeas petitions1
17
were timely and also “that an extraordinary circumstance prevented him from timely filing
18
as he diligently pursued his rights,” challenging the state court rulings on both procedural and
19
substantive grounds, alleging innocence and miscarriage of justice.
20
The Court finds, after consideration of the matters presented and an independent
21
review of the record herein, that the Petition should be denied and this action be dismissed
22
as recommended.
23
Based on the foregoing,
24
25
26
27
28
1
Petitioner filed CV 05-050-TUC-FRZ; CV 05-051-TUC-FRZ and CV 05-052-TUCFRZ on January 27, 2005, challenging the unrelated, unconsolidated convictions in Cochise
County Superior Court in case numbers CR–98000325, CR–98000452 and
CR–97000484(B), respectively.
-2-
1
IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Ferraro’s Report and Recommendation [Doc.
2
25] is hereby ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED as the findings of fact and conclusions of law
3
by this Court;
4
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED;
5
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that judgment be entered accordingly.
6
7
DATED this 14th day of September, 2011.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?