Cleere v. Arizona, State of et al
Filing
17
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. 16 . Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED and action is dismissed w/ prejudice in favor of Respondents. A Final Judgment shall enter separately.***See attached PDF for complete information.*** Signed by Judge David C Bury on 8/3/10. (MLH)
Cleere v. Arizona, State of et al
Doc. 17
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Frederic B. Cleere, Petitioner, vs. State or Arizona, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CV-07-237-TUC-DCB ORDER
Magistrate Judge Pyle issued his Report and Recommendation on July 16, 2010, recommending that the District Court deny the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and dismiss the action with prejudice. A copy was sent to all parties on July 16, 2010, notifying all parties that written objections must be filed within fourteen days of service. 28 U.S.C. §636(b). No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed. Consequently, any objections that have not been raised are waived and will not be addressed by the Court. The Court, having made an independent review of the record, orders as follows: IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Pyle's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 16) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED by this Court as the findings of fact and conclusions of law. IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED and this action is dismissed with prejudice in favor of Respondents. A Final Judgment shall enter separately. DATED this 3rd day of August, 2010.
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?