Wells v. Kearney et al

Filing 124

ORDER adopting 121 Report and Recommendations & 122 Report and Recommendations; dftS Cia Wells and Alan Belauskas are dismissed without prejudice from this case. The Court imposes $15,000 in sanctions against Pla; each parties requesting sa ntions; Dft Schwartz, John Knox Village and Broad and Casse is awarded $5000 from the $15,000 sanction. The Clerk shall enter jgm accordingly. At this case was originally assigned to Magistrate Judge Marshall and the referral pertains to a ll pretrial proceedings, case referred back to Magistrate Judge Marshall for pretrial proceedings. ***SEE ATTACHED PDF FOR FURTHER INFORMATION***. Signed by Judge Frank R Zapata on 01/13/10.(LMF, ) Modified on 1/14/2010 (JEMB, MODIFIED TO INCLUDE REFERRAL TEXT).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pending before the Court are two Report and Recommendations which were issued on December 2, 2009. See Doc. #'s 121, 122. United States Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Marshall issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. #121) recommending the dismissal of two defendants without prejudice as Plaintiff failed to effect service. In addition, United States Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Marshall issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. #122) recommending sanctions in the amount $15,000 against Plaintiff. The Report and Recommendations indicated that any party could file written objections within ten days after being served with copies of the Report and Recommendations. Copies of both Report and Recommendations (Doc. #'s 121, 122) were mailed to Plaintiff on December 2, 2009. The parties have not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendations. As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence. See generally United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. vs. Hon. Jan E. Kearney, et al., Defendants. Cheryl Wells, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 07-309-TUC-FRZ (JM) ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2003)(en banc)(failure to timely file objections to any factual or legal determination of the Magistrate Judge may be considered a waiver of the party's right to de novo consideration of the issues). The Court has reviewed the entire record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Marshall's recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) United States Magistrate Judge Marshall's Report and Recommendations (Doc. #'s 121, 122) are ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED. (2) Defendants Cia Wells and Alan Belauskas are dismissed without prejudice from this case. (3) The Court imposes $15,000.00 in sanctions against Plaintiff; each of the three parties requesting sanctions (i.e. Defendants Phillip Schwartz, John Knox Village, and Broad and Cassel) is awarded $5,000 from the $15,000 sanction. (4) The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. (5) As this case was originally assigned to Magistrate Judge Marshall, and the referral pertains to all pretrial proceedings, the referral to Magistrate Judge Marshall is still in effect; this case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Marshall to the extent pretrial proceedings remain in this case. DATED this 13th day of January, 2010. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?