Loeffler-Boggia v. Astrue
ORDER adopting 24 Report and Recommendations; denying 14 pla's Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 21 dft's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. Case dismissed w/ prejudice; Clk Crt to enter jgm. Signed by Judge Frank R Zapata on 2/11/09.(KMF, )
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant vs. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Mary L. Loeffler-Boggia, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 07-335-TUC-FRZ (JM) ORDER
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment pertaining to the denial of disability benefits. Also pending before the Court is Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment regarding the same denial of disability benefits. United States Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Marshall issued a Report and Recommendation on November 18, 2008. In that Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Marshall recommended denying Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and granting Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. The Report and Recommendation indicated that any party could file written objections within ten days after being served with a copy of the Report and Recommendation. The parties have not filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence. The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Marshall's recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72;
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) United States Magistrate Judge Marshall's Report and Recommendation (Doc. #24) is ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED. (2) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #14) is DENIED. (3) Defendant's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #21) is GRANTED. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (4) The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the file in this matter. DATED this 11th day of February, 2009.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?