Sloan v. Wynn
Filing
10
ORDER Dismissing as Moot 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Clerk of Court to enter Judgment and close the file in this matter. Clerk of Court to correct the caption to indicate the correct name of Respondent. Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 2/3/09. (LSI, )
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
WO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
CARL EMERSON SLOAN, Petitioner, vs. LOUIS WINN, Respondent.
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
No. CIV 07-603-TUC-CKJ ORDER
Pending before the Court is Petitioner's Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody. Respondent has filed a Return and Answer and Petitioner has filed a Reply.
Factual and Procedural Background On July 28, 2003, Petitioner Carl Emerson Sloan ("Sloan") was sentenced to a one year and one day term of incarceration for a violation of supervised release in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Sloan's sentence was ordered to be served consecutively to the sentence he was currently under, a sentence imposed by the State of Tennessee, Court of DeKalb. Sloan was committed to federal custody on May 15, 2007. Sloan was incarcerated at FCI Tucson, Arizona, at the time of the filing of the Petition. However, the Bureau of Prisons Inmate Locator indicates that Sloan was released from federal custody on March 28,
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
2008.1 On November 15, 2007, Sloan filed his Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody. Sloan asserts that additional time spent in custody should be credited against his federal sentence. On December 20, 2007, Respondent
filed a Return and Answer. On December 28, 2007, Sloan filed a Reply.
Jurisdiction of the Court "Federal courts are always
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?