Crumly v. Astrue
ORDER adopting 13 Report and Recommendations; granting 10 Motion for Summary Judgment; case remanded to Commissioner; Clk Crt to enter jgm & close case. Signed by Judge Raner C Collins on 7/29/10.(KMF)
Crumly v. Astrue
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court reviews de novo the objected to portions of the Report and Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1); FED.R.CIV.P. 72(b). The Court review for clear error the unobjected-to portions of the Report and Recommendation. Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); see also Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F.Supp.2d 1203, 1204 (D.Or. 1998).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ) Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social) Security, ) ) Defendant. ) ) )
No. CV 08-674-TUC-RCC ORDER
Pending before this Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Charles R. Pyle.1 The Report and Recommendation recommends granting Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and remanding this case with instructions outlined under the remedy section of the Report and Recommendation because the ALJ's decision is not supported by substantial evidence in the record and free of legal error. Defendant's objections primarily raise issues that were already considered and appropriately addressed by Magistrate Judge Pyle. As Magistrate Judge Pyle thoroughly and correctly analyzed, the
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
ALJ--(1) failed to evaluate treating physician Dr. Barnett's opinion about Plaintiff's sensitivity to loud noices or general opinion that Plaintiff is chronically disables; (2) erred in evaluating Plaintiff's mother's statements; (3) erred in evaluating Plaintiff's sensitivity to light; (4) erred in evaluating Plaintiff's medical treatment; and (5) erred in evaluating Plaintiff's daily activities. There is no reversible error in this matter and Defendant's objections are denied. See Report and Recommendation at 22-30. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: (1) United States Magistrate Judge Pyle's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 13) is accepted and adopted. (2) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 10) is granted. (3) This case is remanded to the Commissioner with instruction as outlined in the Remedy section of the Report and Recommendation. See Report and Recommendation 3137. (4) The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. DATED this 29th day of July, 2010.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?