Stafford v. Ryan et al
Filing
28
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 27 Report and Recommendations. the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice. A Final Judgment shall enter separately. Signed by Judge David C Bury on 10/30/12. (LMF)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
6
Warren Frank Stafford,
7
Plaintiff,
8
vs.
9
Charles Ryan, et al.,
10
Defendants.
11
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CV-09-363-TUC-DCB
ORDER
12
Magistrate Judge Bowman issued her Report and Recommendation on October 9,
13
2012, recommending that the District Court deny the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and
14
dismiss the action with prejudice.
15
notifying all parties that written objections must be filed within fourteen days of service. 28
16
U.S.C. §636(b). No objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation have
17
been filed. Consequently, any objections that have not been raised are waived and will not
18
be addressed by the Court.
A copy was sent to all parties on October 9, 2012,
19
The Court, having made an independent review of the record, orders as follows:
20
IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Bowman’s Report and Recommendation
21
(Doc. 27) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED by this Court as the findings of fact and
22
conclusions of law.
23
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is
24
DENIED and this action is dismissed with prejudice. A Final Judgment shall enter
25
separately.
26
27
28
DATED this 30th day of October, 2012.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?