Leon v. Securaplane Technologies, Inc. et al

Filing 13

ORDER denying as moot 4 Motion to Dismiss Case; granting 5 Motion to Remand to State Court; adopting Report and Recommendations re 11 Report and Recommendations. This matter is REMANDED to the Pima County Superior Court (Case No. C20091791). The Clk of Ct shall mail certified copy of this Order to the Clk of the Pima County Superior Court. The Clk of the Ct shall then close its file in this matter. Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 9/17/09.(SGG, )

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Accordingly, after an independent review, IT IS ORDERED: 1. 2. 3. AS MOOT. The Report and Recommendation [Doc. # 11] is ADOPTED. Plaintiff's Motion to Remand [Doc. # 5] is GRANTED. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike [Doc. # 4] are DENIED On August 27, 2009, Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Guerin issued a Report and Recommendation [Doc. # 11] in which she recommended that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand [Doc. # 5] be granted and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike [Doc. # 4] be dismissed as moot. The magistrate judge advised the parties that written objections to the Report and Recommendation were to be filed within ten days of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b). No objections have been filed. vs. SECURAPLANE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Defendants. MICHAEL LEON, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA No. CIV 09-390-TUC-CKJ (JCG) ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4. C20091791); 5. This matter is REMANDED to the Pima County Superior Court (Cause # The Clerk of the Court shall mail a certified copy of this Order to the Clerk of the Pima County Superior Court; and 6. The Clerk of the Court shall then close its file in this matter. DATED this 17th day of September, 2009. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?