Elias v. Astrue

Filing 25

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 24 . Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment 19 is GRANTED IN PART. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in this case and shall then close its file in this matter. Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 4/5/11. (KAH)

Download PDF
-GEE Elias v. Astrue Doc. 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 On March 9, 2011, Magistrate Judge Glenda E. Edmonds issued a Report and 16 Recommendation [Doc. # 24] in which she recommended that Plaintiff's Motion for 17 Summary Judgment [Doc. # 19] be granted in part and this matter be remanded for further 18 proceedings. Magistrate Judge Edmonds advised the parties that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 19 636(b), any written objections were to be filed and served within 14 days after being served 20 with a copy of the Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed within the 21 time provided. 22 Accordingly, after an independent review, IT IS ORDERED: 23 1. 24 2. 25 PART; 26 3. 27 proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation; 28 This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 19] is GRANTED IN The Report and Recommendation [Doc. # 24] is ADOPTED; vs. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant. MARGARET ELIAS, Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA No. CIV 10-244-TUC-CKJ (GEE) ORDER Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in this case and shall then close its file in this matter. DATED this 5th day of April, 2011. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?