Barron v. Winn
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. 11 Report and Recommendations, The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 11) is adopted inwhole. The Petition (Doc. 1) is denied and this case is dismissed. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case and enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge A Wallace Tashima on 3/18/11. (KAD)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 vs. Roland R. Barron,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Warden Louis Winn, 8 Respondent. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
No. 10-CV-399-TUC-AWT ORDER
This case involves a Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Petitioner Roland Barron on June 30, 2010 (Doc. 1). On December 20, 2010, after a thorough and well-documented analysis, Magistrate Judge D. Thomas Ferraro issued a Report and Recommendation (R & R) to this Court, recommending that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied. Petitioner did not object to the R & R. The Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's R & R in whole. Petitioner's claim is moot in light of the inability of the Court to grant relief. Because the Court does not have jurisdiction, the petition must be denied. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 11) is adopted in whole. The Petition (Doc. 1) is denied and this case is dismissed. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case and enter judgment accordingly. DATED this 18th day of March, 2011.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?