Farnsworth v. Graber

Filing 16

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. 15 Report and Recommendations. Petitioners §2241 habeas petition is denied. The motion to amend the petition is denied, and this case is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the file in this matter. Signed by Senior Judge Frank R Zapata on 06/02/11. (LMF)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Richard Brent Farnsworth, Petitioner, 10 11 vs. 12 Conrad Graber, 13 Respondent. 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 10-533-TUC-FRZ (GEE) ORDER 15 16 Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States 17 Magistrate Judge Edmonds that recommends denying Petitioner’s habeas petition filed 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2241 and denying Petitioner’s motion to amend the petition. A 19 review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any objections to the Report and 20 Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. As such, the Court will not 21 consider any objections or new evidence. 22 The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Edmonds’ 23 recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; 24 Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 25 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). 26 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 27 (1) Magistrate Judge Edmonds’ Report and Recommendation (Doc. 15) is accepted and 28 adopted. 1 (2) Petitioner’s §2241 habeas petition is denied, the motion to amend the petition is denied, 2 and this case is dismissed with prejudice. 3 (3) The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the file in this matter. 4 5 DATED this 2nd day of June, 2011. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?