Thomas v. United States District Court of Arizona et al

Filing 23

ORDER re 22 : Defendant Carla Thomas having twice failed to file an opening brief or request an extension within the time set by the magistrate judge, this Court finds the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith. IT IS ORDERED Thomas in forma pauperis status is REVOKED. The Clerk of the Court shall notify the appellate court of this ruling. Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 10/20/11.(BAC)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

CARLA THOMAS,
Plaintiff,

10
11

vs.

12

UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE,
COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

13
14

Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. CIV 10-596-TUC-CKJ
ORDER

15
On October 18, 2011, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals referred this matter to this
16
Court for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis status should
17
continue for this appeal or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith. The
18
applicable statute states that an "appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court
19
certifies in writing that it is not taken in good faith." 28 U.S.C. § 1015(a)(3).
20
Plaintiff Carla Thomas ("Thomas ") filed her Complaint on October 1, 2010. Thomas
21
was granted in forma pauperis status on December 7, 2010. An Answer was filed on
22
February 23, 2011, and the Administrative Record was filed on February 24, 2011.
23
On February 28, 2011, Magistrate Judge Glenda E. Edmonds issued a Social Security
24
Scheduling Order in which she directed Thomas to file an opening brief within sixty (60)
25
days from the filing of the answer and record. Thomas did not file an opening brief.
26
On May 10, 2011, Magistrate Judge Edmonds ordered Thomas to show cause why this
27
case should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the court's scheduling order. On
28

1

May 17, 2011, Thomas field a response and, on June 3, 2011, Magistrate Judge Edmonds

2

ordered as follows:

3
4
5

Pursuant to this court’s scheduling order issued on February 28, 2011, the plaintiff,
Carla Thomas, shall file by July 15, 2011, her opening brief explaining “why the
Commissioner’s decision is not supported by substantial evidence or why the decision
should otherwise be reversed or the case remanded.” LRCiv. 16.1[.] If Thomas fails
to file a timely opening brief, this action may be dismissed without further notice to
the plaintiff. Fed.R.Civ.P. 16 (f)(1)(C).

6
Doc. 18. Thomas did not file an opening brief.
7
On August 9, 2011, this Court issued an Order dismissing this case; judgment was
8
entered.
9
Thomas having twice failed to file an opening brief or request an extension within the
10
time set by the magistrate judge, this Court finds the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith.
11
Accordingly IT IS ORDERED Thomas in forma pauperis status is REVOKED.
12
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk of the Court shall notify the appellate court
13
of this ruling.
14
DATED this 20th day of October, 2011.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2-