Cox v. Ryan et al
Filing
14
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. 13 Report and Recommendations. Petitioner's 2254 habeas petition is denied and this case is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the file in this matter. Signed by Senior Judge Frank R Zapata on 9/28/11. (BAR)
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
3
Bryan Joseph Cox,
4
5
Petitioner,
vs.
6
Charles Ryan, et al.,
7
Respondents.
8
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV 10-611-TUC-FRZ (JCG)
ORDER
9
10
Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States
11
Magistrate Judge Guerin that recommends denying Petitioner’s habeas petition filed pursuant
12
to 28 U.S.C. §2254. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any
13
objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired.
14
As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence.
15
The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Guerin’s
16
recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72;
17
Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14
18
F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998).
19
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
20
(1) Magistrate Judge Guerin’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 13) is accepted and
21
adopted.
22
(2) Petitioner’s §2254 habeas petition is denied and this case is dismissed with prejudice.
23
(3) The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the file in this matter.
24
DATED this 28th day of September, 2011.
25
26
27
28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?