Nguyen v. Holder et al
Filing
34
ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 33 Report and Recommendations. Granting Defendants' 20 Motion to Dismiss. This case is dismissed and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Frank R Zapata on 5/21/2012. (GCP)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Binh Nguyen,
Plaintiffs,
10
11
vs.
12
Eric H. Holder, Jr., et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV 11-295-TUC-FRZ (GEE)
ORDER
15
16
Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States
17
Magistrate Judge Glenda E. Edmonds that recommends granting Defendants’ motion to
18
dismiss. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any objections to the
19
Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. As such, the Court
20
will not consider any objections or new evidence.
21
The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Edmonds’
22
recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72;
23
Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14
24
F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998).
25
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
26
(1) Magistrate Judge Edmonds’ Report and Recommendation (Doc. 33) is accepted and
27
adopted.
28
(2) Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. 20) is granted.
1
(3) This case is dismissed and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment.
2
3
DATED this 21st day of May, 2012.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?