Genao v. Apker et al

Filing 21

ORDER denying 11 Motion Contempt; denying 12 Motion to Strike ; adopting Report and Recommendations re 14 Report and Recommendations.; denied as moot 16 Motion for Oral Argument; denied as moot 17 Motion to Strike ; denied as moot 19 Motion for Leave to File Amended Petition. Clerk of Court must enter judgment.. Signed by Senior Judge Frank R Zapata on 8/6/2012.(JKM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Ismael Genao, Petitioner, 10 11 vs. 12 Craig Apker, Respondent. 13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 11-388-TUC-FRZ (GEE) ORDER 14 15 Before the Court for consideration is a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by 16 Petitioner Ismael Genao pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, and the Report and Recommendation 17 of the Magistrate Judge, recommending the dismissal of the Petition. 18 Petitioner raises six grounds for relief arising from two disciplinary incidents, which 19 resulted in the loss of 81 days of good-time credit, claiming his constitutional rights to due 20 process were violated. 21 This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Glenda E. Edmonds, pursuant to the 22 provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), Rule 72, Fed.R.Civ.P., and Local Rules 72.1 and 72.2 of 23 the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, for 24 further proceedings and report and recommendation. 25 Magistrate Judge Edmonds issued her Report and Recommendation, recommending 26 that the Court, after its independent review of the record, enter an order denying the Petition 27 for Writ of Habeas Corpus on the merits and deny Petitioner’s motions for contempt and to 28 strike. 1 2 3 4 The Report and Recommendation sets forth the factual and procedural history of the disciplinary actions at issue and provides a thorough legal analysis of the claims asserted. Petitioner filed his Objection to the Report and Recommendation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b), challenging the substantive findings set forth therein. 5 The Court finds, after consideration of all matters presented and an independent 6 review of the record herein, including Petitioner’s Objection, that the Report and 7 Recommendation shall be adopted. 8 Based on the foregoing, 9 IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Edmond’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 10 14) is hereby ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED as the findings of fact and conclusions of law 11 of this Court; 12 13 14 15 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED and this action is hereby DISMISSED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for Contemp (Doc. 11) and Motion to Strike (Doc. 12) are thereby DENIED; 16 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motions for Oral Argument (Doc. 16); 17 Motion to Strike (Doc. 17); and Motion for Leave to File Amended Petition (Doc. 19) are 18 DENIED as moot; 19 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court enter judgment accordingly. 20 21 DATED this 6th day of August, 2012. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?