Roberts v. Astrue

Filing 25

ORDER granting 24 Amended Motion for Relief of Order and Judgment Pursuant to Rule 60(b. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter an Amended Judgment as set forth in the nunc pro tunc Amended Order filed this same date. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hector C Estrada on 5/22/2013.(BAR)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner)
)
of Social Security,
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
Curtis Roberts,

No. CV 11-801-TUC-HCE
ORDER

16
17
Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Amended Motion For Relief of Order and
18
Judgment Pursuant to Rule 60(b) (Doc. 24). The response time for Defendant’s Motion has
19
passed and Plaintiff has not filed a response. Pursuant to Rule 7.2(i), Rules of Practice of the
20
U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s Amended
21
Motion for Relief of Order and Judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil
22
Procedure (Doc. 24) is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter an Amended
23
Judgment as set forth in the nunc pro tunc Amended Order filed this same date.
24
25
26
27
28

DATED this 22nd day of May, 2013.