Tombstone, City of v. United States of America et al

Filing 57

ORDER re: The Court's previous Order is vacated; the parties shall not file proposed orders containing findings of fact and conclusions of law.. Signed by Senior Judge Frank R Zapata on 5/6/12.

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 7 8 City of Tombstone, 9 Plaintiff, 10 vs. 11 United States of America, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 11-845-TUC-FRZ ORDER 14 15 Upon further review of the briefs, record, and authority throughout the weekend, the Court 16 finds that proposed orders containing findings of fact and conclusions of law are unnecessary 17 and will likely result in further delay. As such, the Court’s previous Order (Doc. 56) is 18 vacated; the parties shall not file proposed orders containing findings of fact and conclusions 19 of law. The Court apologizes for any inconvenience this may have caused for the parties. 20 The Court expects to issue a fairly brief Order in the next few days. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DATED this 6th day of May, 2012.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?