Tombstone, City of v. United States of America et al

Filing 57

ORDER re: The Court's previous Order is vacated; the parties shall not file proposed orders containing findings of fact and conclusions of law.. Signed by Senior Judge Frank R Zapata on 5/6/12.

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

7
8

City of Tombstone,

9

Plaintiff,

10

vs.

11
United States of America, et al.,
12
Defendants.
13

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. CV 11-845-TUC-FRZ
ORDER

14
15

Upon further review of the briefs, record, and authority throughout the weekend, the Court

16

finds that proposed orders containing findings of fact and conclusions of law are unnecessary

17

and will likely result in further delay. As such, the Court’s previous Order (Doc. 56) is

18

vacated; the parties shall not file proposed orders containing findings of fact and conclusions

19

of law. The Court apologizes for any inconvenience this may have caused for the parties.

20

The Court expects to issue a fairly brief Order in the next few days.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

DATED this 6th day of May, 2012.