Curtis v. Ryan et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 19 . It is further ordered that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1 is DENIED and this action is DISMISSED. The Clerk's Office is directed to enter a separate Final Judgment in accordance with this Order. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 8/13/15. (KAH)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Nathaniel Keon Curtis,
Charles L. Ryan, et al.,
This matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§636(b)(1)(B) and the local rules of practice of this Court for report and recommendation
on the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, 28 U.S.C. §2254.
Magistrate Judge Markovich issued his Report and Recommendation on July 27, 2015
(Doc. 19), recommending that the Petition may be denied and the action dismissed. A copy
was sent to all parties. No objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation
have been filed. Any objections that have not been raised are waived and will not be
addressed by the Court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).
The Court, having made an independent review of the record, orders as follows:
IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc.
19) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED by this Court as the findings of fact and conclusions of
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is
DENIED and this action is DISMISSED. The Clerk’s Office is directed to enter a separate
Final Judgment in accordance with this Order.
DATED this 13th day of August, 2015.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?