Beltran v. Ryan et al
Filing
29
ORDER denying as moot 13 Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply as to 8 MOTION for Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Leslie A Bowman on 12/5/13.(KAH)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Rosalio Delgado Beltran,
Petitioner,
10
11
vs.
12
Charles L. Ryan; et al.,
13
Respondents.
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CIV 13-014-TUC-LAB
ORDER
15
16
17
Pending before the court is the petitioner’s motion for an extension of the deadline for
filing a reply to the respondents’ answer. (Doc. 13)
18
The petitioner, Rosalio Delgado Beltran, filed in this court a petition for Writ of Habeas
19
Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. 1) The respondents filed an answer to the petition
20
on June 20, 2013. (Doc. 19)
21
22
23
24
In a separate motion, Beltran asked that the court give him access to electronic legal
databases. (Doc. 14)
In the pending motion, Beltran moves that the court extend the deadline for filing a reply
to a date 28 days after he receives that access. (Doc. 13)
25
The court notes that Beltran’s motion for electronic legal access was denied on December
26
4, 2013. (Doc. 28) The court further notes that Beltran has already filed a timely reply
27
(containing more than forty legal citations) to the respondents’ answer. (Doc. 24) Accordingly,
28
1
2
IT IS ORDERED that the petitioner’s motion for an extension of the deadline for filing
a reply to the respondents’ answer is DENIED as MOOT. (Doc. 13)
3
4
DATED this 5th day of December, 2013.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?