Lind v. Carpenter et al
Filing
144
ORDER RE: Motion for a status conference.. Signed by Judge James A Soto on 8/25/15.
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
3
4
Shari A. Lind,
No. CV-13-00032-TUC-JAS
Plaintiff,
5
6
v.
7
ORDER
Joshua Kevin Carpenter, et al.,
8
Defendants.
9
10
Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint motion for a telephonic status
11
conference. The motion is granted to the extent this Order should resolve any concerns
12
reflected in the motion, and is denied to the extent a telephonic status conference is
13
unnecessary in light of this Order. The parties have concerns with various deadlines in
14
the Scheduling Order expiring prior to the resolution of discovery disputes, and the
15
impact on other requirements in the Scheduling Order. As such, all deadlines in the
16
Scheduling Order are stayed until after the current discovery disputes (as well as the
17
motion the Government expects to file in the near future) are ruled upon by the Court.
18
Within 14 days after the Court rules on the discovery disputes, the parties shall submit a
19
stipulation (or motion if the parties can not reach an agreement) and proposed Order
20
which will almost certainly be granted. The Court is flexible and the deadlines in the
21
Scheduling Order are fluid; the parties should feel free to consult with each other and
22
submit stipulations and proposed Orders adjusting the deadlines and adding any
23
necessary clarification that is best for them.
24
Dated this 25th day of August, 2015.
25
26
27
28
Honorable James A. Soto
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?