Lind v. Carpenter et al

Filing 144

ORDER RE: Motion for a status conference.. Signed by Judge James A Soto on 8/25/15.

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 3 4 Shari A. Lind, No. CV-13-00032-TUC-JAS Plaintiff, 5 6 v. 7 ORDER Joshua Kevin Carpenter, et al., 8 Defendants. 9 10 Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint motion for a telephonic status 11 conference. The motion is granted to the extent this Order should resolve any concerns 12 reflected in the motion, and is denied to the extent a telephonic status conference is 13 unnecessary in light of this Order. The parties have concerns with various deadlines in 14 the Scheduling Order expiring prior to the resolution of discovery disputes, and the 15 impact on other requirements in the Scheduling Order. As such, all deadlines in the 16 Scheduling Order are stayed until after the current discovery disputes (as well as the 17 motion the Government expects to file in the near future) are ruled upon by the Court. 18 Within 14 days after the Court rules on the discovery disputes, the parties shall submit a 19 stipulation (or motion if the parties can not reach an agreement) and proposed Order 20 which will almost certainly be granted. The Court is flexible and the deadlines in the 21 Scheduling Order are fluid; the parties should feel free to consult with each other and 22 submit stipulations and proposed Orders adjusting the deadlines and adding any 23 necessary clarification that is best for them. 24 Dated this 25th day of August, 2015. 25 26 27 28 Honorable James A. Soto United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?