Bride v. McClintock
Filing
19
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 18 . Petitioner's § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1 ) is DENIED. This case is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 1/12/15. (See attached PDF for complete information.) (KAH)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Titus T. Bride,
No. CV-13-00136-TUC-JGZ
Petitioner,
10
11
v.
12
ORDER
Susan McClintock,
13
Respondent.
14
Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United
15
States Magistrate Judge Jacqueline J. Rateau that recommends denying Petitioner’s §
16
2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Doc. 18.)
17
A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any objections to the
18
Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. As such, the
19
Court will not consider any objections or new evidence.
20
The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Rateau’s
21
recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P.
22
72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir.1999); see also Conley v.
23
Crabtree, 14 F.Supp.2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998).
24
“The plain language of [28 U.S.C.] § 2253(c)(1) does not require a petitioner to
25
obtain a [certificate of appealability] in order to appeal the denial of a § 2241 petition.”
26
Harrison v. Ollison, 519 F.3d 952, 958 (9th Cir. 2008). “Nor is there any other statutory
27
basis for imposing a [certificate of appealability] requirement on legitimate § 2241
28
petitions. Although state prisoners proceeding under § 2241 must obtain a [certificate of
1
appealability], see § 2253(c)(1)(A), there is no parallel requirement for federal prisoners.”
2
Id. Accordingly, because Petitioner is a federal prisoner bringing a legitimate § 2241
3
petition, a certificate of appealability is not required.
4
5
6
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
1. Magistrate Judge Rateau’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 18) is accepted and
adopted;
7
2. Petitioner’s § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED;
8
3. This case is dismissed with prejudice;
9
4. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly.
10
Dated this 12th day of January, 2015.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?