United States of America v. 5.62 Acres of Land et al

Filing 108

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Magistrate Judge Macdonald's 89 Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted. Plaintiff's 68 Motion for consolidation is denied. Signed by Judge James A Soto on 9/25/2015. (KEP)

Download PDF
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) 5.62 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate) in Santa Cruz County, State of Arizona;) Landmark Title Assurance Agency of) Arizona, An Arizona LLC Under Trust) ) 18223-T, et al., United States of America, No. CV 13-198-TUC-JAS (BGM) ORDER 10 Defendant. 11 12 Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge 13 Macdonald. In the Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Macdonald recommends 14 denying Plaintiff’s motion for consolidation. As the Court finds that the Report and 15 Recommendation appropriately recommended denying consolidation, the objections are 16 denied.1 17 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 18 (1) Magistrate Judge Macdonald’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 89) is accepted and 19 adopted. (2) Plaintiff’s motion for consolidation (Doc. 68) is denied. 20 DATED this 25th day of September, 2015. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 The Court reviews de novo the objected-to portions of the Report and Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The Court reviews for clear error the unobjected-to portions of the Report and Recommendation. See Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); see also Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?