United States of America v. 5.62 Acres of Land et al

Filing 108

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Magistrate Judge Macdonald's #89 Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted. Plaintiff's #68 Motion for consolidation is denied. Signed by Judge James A Soto on 9/25/2015. (KEP)

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
5.62 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate)
in Santa Cruz County, State of Arizona;)
Landmark Title Assurance Agency of)
Arizona, An Arizona LLC Under Trust)
)
18223-T, et al.,
United States of America,

No. CV 13-198-TUC-JAS (BGM)
ORDER

10
Defendant.
11
12
Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge
13
Macdonald. In the Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Macdonald recommends
14
denying Plaintiff’s motion for consolidation. As the Court finds that the Report and
15
Recommendation appropriately recommended denying consolidation, the objections are
16

denied.1

17
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
18
(1) Magistrate Judge Macdonald’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 89) is accepted and
19
adopted. (2) Plaintiff’s motion for consolidation (Doc. 68) is denied.
20

DATED this 25th day of September, 2015.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

The Court reviews de novo the objected-to portions of the Report and Recommendation.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The Court reviews for clear error the unobjected-to
portions of the Report and Recommendation. See Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734,
739 (7th Cir. 1999); see also Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998).