Ferrell v. Ryan et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 29 . It is ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1 ) is DENIED and this action is dismissed with prejudice. A Final Judgment shall enter separately. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 9/22/14. (KAH)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Stanford Lamar Ferrell,
Charles L. Ryan, et al.,
Magistrate Judge Bowman issued her Report and Recommendation on July 22, 2014,
recommending that the District Court DENY the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and
dismiss the action with prejudice. A copy was sent to all parties and Petitioner was granted
an extension of time to file objections. No objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation have been timely filed. Consequently, any objections that have not been
raised are waived and will not be addressed by the Court.
The Court, having made an independent review of the record, orders as follows:
IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Bowman’s Report and Recommendation
(Doc. 29) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED by this Court as the findings of fact and
conclusions of law.
IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED
and this action is dismissed with prejudice. A Final Judgment shall enter separately.
DATED this 22nd day of September, 2014.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?