Gurule v. Apker
Filing
21
ORDER as follows: Magistrate Judge Markovich's Report and Recommendation ( 20 ) is accepted and adopted. Petitioner's §2241 Petition ( 1 ) is denied. This case is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the file in this case. Signed by Judge James A Soto on 9/1/2016. (SIB)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Michael Anthony Gurule,
Petitioner,
10
11
vs.
12
Craig Apker,
13
Respondent.
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV 13-720-TUC-JAS (EJM)
ORDER
15
16
Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States
17
Magistrate Judge Markovich that recommends denying Petitioner’s §2241 Petition. A review
18
of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any objections to the Report and
19
Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. As such, the Court will not
20
consider any objections or new evidence.
21
The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Markovich’s
22
recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72;
23
Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14
24
F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998).
25
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
26
(1) Magistrate Judge Markovich’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 20) is accepted and
27
adopted.
28
(2) Petitioner’s §2241 Petition (Doc. 1) is denied.
1
(3) This case is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and
2
close the file in this case.
3
4
DATED this 1st day of September, 2016.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?