Lee v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 31

ORDER ADOPTING 28 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed and benefits are denied. This case is dismissed. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the file in this matter. Signed by Judge James A Soto on 2/13/15.(BAC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner) ) of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) ) Ollie Lee Lee, No. CV 13-768-TUC-JAS (LAB) ORDER 16 17 Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States 18 Magistrate Judge Bowman.1 The Report and Recommendation recommends affirming the 19 decision of the Commissioner and denying benefits. As the Report and Recommendation 20 correctly resolved the dispute, Plaintiff’s objections are denied. Thus, the Report and 21 Recommendation is adopted. 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 23 (1) United States Magistrate Judge Bowman’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 28) is 24 accepted and adopted. 25 26 27 28 1 The Court reviews de novo the objected-to portions of the Report and Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The Court reviews for clear error the unobjected-to portions of the Report and Recommendation. Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); see also Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). 1 (2) The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed and benefits are denied. 2 (3) This case is dismissed. 3 (4) The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the file in this matter. 4 5 DATED this 13th day of February, 2015. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?