Rudisill v. Ryan et al

Filing 146

ORDER granting 145 Motion to Terminate Amended Stipulation 119 . Signed by Senior Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 2/12/2024. (MCO)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Stephen Louis Rudisill, 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 Charles Ryan, et al., 13 No. CV-13-01149-TUC-CKJ ORDER Defendants. 14 15 On February 5, 2016, by Order (Doc. 139). this Court terminated this case pursuant 16 to an Amended Stipulation (Doc. 119) calling for certain actions to be taken by Defendants 17 and for oversite by a Court Monitor, James Austin, Ph.D., who has been monitoring 18 Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry’s (ADCRR) progress and 19 compliance for the last 5 years (2016-2023). He indicates that ADCRR has successfully 20 integrated and recommends an end to monitoring. Defendants’ request termination of the 21 Amended Stipulation. There is no objection, and the Court finds good cause, 22 Accordingly, 23 IT IS ORDERED that the Defendants’ Motion to Terminate Amended Stipulation 24 for Order and all Amendments Thereto (Doc. 145) is GRANTED. 25 ///// 26 ///// 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 2 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Amended Stipulation for Order (Doc. 119) and any amendments thereto is hereby formally terminated. Dated this 12th day of February, 2024. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?