Maisano v. Corizon Health Incorporated et al

Filing 3

ORDER REASSIGNING AND DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Case reassigned to Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield for all further proceedings. Judge Raner C Collins no longer assigned to case. Clerk must file this order in this case, enter judgment a ccordingly, and close the case. Clerk shall accept no further documents for filing in this case, other than those in furtherance of an appeal. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 4/8/2014. ( A copy of this document mailed to Dale Maisano on this date). (ADI-KAH, )

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
ORDER

9
10

Maisano v. Horne, et al.

No.

14-01545-TUC-RCB

11

Maisano v. Horne, et al.

No.

14-01546-TUC-RCB

12

Maisano v. Horne, et al.

No.

14-01547-TUC-RCB

13

Maisano v. Horne, et al.

No.

14-01548-TUC-RCB

14

Maisano v. Horne, et al.

No.

14-01549-TUC-RCB

15

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al.

No.

14-01550-TUC-RCB

16

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al.

No.

14-01551-TUC-RCB

17

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc.

No.

14-01552-TUC-RCB

18

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc.

No.

14-01553-TUC-RCB

19

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc.

No.

14-01554-TUC-RCB

20

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc.

No.

14-01555-TUC-RCB

21

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al.

No.

14-01556-TUC-RCB

22

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc.

No.

14-01557-TUC-RCB

23

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al.

No.

14-01558-TUC-RCB

24

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al.

No.

14-01559-TUC-RCB

25

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc.

No.

14-01560-TUC-RCB

26

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al.

No.

14-01561-TUC-RCB

27

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc.

No.

14-01562-TUC-RCB

28

1

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al.

No.

14-01563-TUC-RCB

2

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc.

No.

14-01564-TUC-RCB

3

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al.

No.

14-01565-TUC-RCB

4

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc.

No.

14-01567-TUC-RCB

5

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al.

No.

14-01568-TUC-RCB

6

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al.

No.

14-01569-TUC-RCB

7

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al.

No.

14-01570-TUC-RCB

8

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc.

No.

14-01571-TUC-RCB

9

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc.

No.

14-01572-TUC-RCB

10

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc.

No.

14-01573-TUC-RCB

11

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc.

No.

14-01574-TUC-RCB

12

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al.

No.

14-01576-TUC-RCB

13

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al.

No.

14-01577-TUC-RCB

14

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al.

No.

14-01578-TUC-RCB

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc.

No.

14-01579-TUC-RCB

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc.

No.

14-01580-TUC-RCB

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc.

No.

14-01581-TUC-RCB

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc.

No.

14-01582-TUC-RCB

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al.

No.

14-01583-TUC-RCB

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al.

No.

14-01589-TUC-RCB

Maisano v. Modrzejewski, et al.

No.

14-01593-TUC-RCB

Maisano v. Modrzejewski, et al.

No.

14-01594-TUC-RCB

Maisano v. Modrzejewski, et al.

No.

14-01595-TUC-RCB

Maisano v. Modrzejewski, et al.

No.

14-01596-TUC-RCB

Maisano v. Modrzejewski, et al.

No.

14-01597-TUC-RCB

Maisano v. Modrzejewski, et al.

No.

14-01598-TUC-RCB

Maisano v. Modrzejewski, et al.

No.

14-01599-TUC-RCB

Maisano v. Ryan, et al.

No.

14-01600-TUC-RCB

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2-

1

Maisano v. Ryan, et al.

No.

14-01601-TUC-RCB

2

Maisano v. Ryan, et al.

No.

14-01602-TUC-RCB

3

Maisano v. Ryan, et al.

No.

14-01603-TUC-RCB

4

Maisano v. Ryan, et al.

No.

14-01604-TUC-RCB

5

Maisano v. Ryan, et al.

No.

14-01605-TUC-RCB

6

Maisano v. Ryan, et al.

No.

14-01606-TUC-RCB

7

Maisano v. Ryan, et al.

No.

14-01607-TUC-RCB

8

Maisano v. Ryan, et al.

No.

14-01608-TUC-RCB

9

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al.

No.

14-01609-TUC-RCB

10

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc.

No.

14-01610-TUC-RCB

11

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al.

No.

14-01611-TUC-RCB

12

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al.

No.

14-01612-TUC-RCB

13

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc.

No.

14-01613-TUC-RCB

14

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc.

No.

14-01614-TUC-RCB

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc.

No.

14-01615-TUC-RCB

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc.

No.

14-01616-TUC-RCB

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc.

No.

14-01617-TUC-RCB

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc.

No.

14-01618-TUC-RCB

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc.

No.

14-01619-TUC-RCB

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al.

No.

14-01620-TUC-RCB

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al.

No.

14-01621-TUC-RCB

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al.

No.

14-01622-TUC-RCB

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al.

No.

14-01623-TUC-RCB

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al.

No.

14-01624-TUC-RCB

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al.

No.

14-01625-TUC-RCB

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al.

No.

14-01626-TUC-RCB

Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al.

No.

14-01627-TUC-RCB

Maisano v. Vega, et al.

No.

14-01628-TUC-RCB

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-3-

1

Maisano v. Vega, et al.

No.

14-01629-TUC-RCB

2

Maisano v. Vega, et al.

No.

14-01630-TUC-RCB

3

Maisano v. Vega, et al.

No.

14-01631-TUC-RCB

4

Maisano v. Vega, et al.

No.

14-01632-TUC-RCB

5

Maisano v. Vega, et al.

No.

14-01633-TUC-RCB

6

Maisano v. Vega, et al.

No.

14-01634-TUC-RCB

7

Maisano v. Trinity Grp./Canteen Food
No.
Servs., et al.

14-01635-TUC-RCB

Maisano v. Trinity Grp./Canteen Food
No.
Servs., et al.

14-01636-TUC-RCB

Maisano v. Trinity Grp./Canteen Food
No.
Servs., et al.

14-01637-TUC-RCB

Maisano v. Canteen/Trinity Corr. Food
No.
Servs. Inc., et al.

14-01638-TUC-RCB

14

Maisano v. Canteen/Trinity Corr. Food
No.
Servs. Inc., et al.

14-01639-TUC-RCB

15

Maisano v. Horne, et al.

No.

14-01640-TUC-RCB

16

Maisano v. Hall, et al.

No.

14-01641-TUC-RCB

17

Maisano v. Hall, et al.

No.

14-01642-TUC-RCB

18

Maisano v. Hall, et al.

No.

14-01643-TUC-RCB

19

Maisano v. Hoyt, et al.

No.

14-01644-TUC-RCB

20

Maisano v. Hoyt, et al.

No.

14-01645-TUC-RCB

21

Maisano v. Deebom, et al.

No.

14-01646-TUC-RCB

22

Maisano v. Deebom, et al.

No.

14-01647-TUC-RCB

23

Maisano v. Deebom, et al.

No.

14-01648-TUC-RCB

24

Maisano v. Zevallos, et al.

No.

14-01649-TUC-RCB

25

Maisano v. Zevallos, et al.

No.

14-01650-TUC-RCB

26

Maisano v. Zevallos, et al.

No.

14-01651-TUC-RCB

27

Maisano v. Clark, et al.

No.

14-01652-TUC-RCB

8
9
10
11
12
13

28
-4-

1

Maisano v. Clark, et al.

No.

14-01653-TUC-RCB

2

Maisano v. Clark, et al.

No.

14-01654-TUC-RCB

3

With the undersigned’s consent, United States District Court Chief Judge Raner C.

4

Collins has directed that the above-captioned cases be reassigned to the undersigned

5

pursuant to Local Rule of Civil Procedure 42.1(e)(3).

6

Plaintiff Dale Maisano, who is confined in the Arizona State Prison Complex-

7

Lewis in Buckeye, Arizona, has so often and egregiously abused the legal process in the

8

past that on August 11, 1992, Senior United States District Judge Stephen M. McNamee

9

entered an Order and Restraining Order enjoining him from filing any civil action in this

10

or any other federal court without first obtaining leave of the court. See August 11, 1992

11

Order and Restraining Order in Maisano v. Lewis, CV 92-1026-PHX-SMM (MS).

12

Pursuant to the Restraining Order, to obtain leave to file, Plaintiff must file an

13

“Application Pursuant to Court Order Seeking Leave to File” accompanied by an

14

affidavit certifying: (1) “that the claim or claims he wishes to present are new and have

15

never been raised and disposed of on the merits by any federal court”; and (2) “that to the

16

best of his knowledge the claim or claims are not frivolous or taken in bad faith.”

17

Additionally, any application seeking leave to file must be accompanied by a copy of the

18

August 11, 1992 Order and Restraining Order in Maisano v. Lewis, CV 92-1026-PHX-

19

SMM (MS).1 In addition, Plaintiff “must attach to future complaints a list of all cases

20

previously filed involving similar or related causes of action.” “Failure to comply

21

strictly with the terms of the [Restraining Order] will be sufficient ground to deny

22

leave to file.” (Emphasis added.)

23

Plaintiff lodged a civil rights Complaint (Doc. 1)2 in each of the above-captioned

24

cases. Plaintiff did not file an Application Pursuant to Court Order Seeking Leave to

25
26
27
28

1

Plaintiff appealed the final judgment in CV 92-1026-PHX-SMM (MS) to the
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. On March 17, 1993, the Court lodged a certified copy of
the Ninth Circuit’s mandate dismissing the appeal.
2

In light of Plaintiff’s history of vexatious litigation and the frequency with which
he lodges complaints, the Clerk of Court has been directed to docket only the name of the
-5-

1

File, a copy of the August 11, 1992 Order and Restraining Order, or a list of his

2

previously filed cases involving similar or related causes of action. Plaintiff, therefore,

3

has failed to comply strictly with the Court-mandated pre-filing requirements. Thus,

4

these actions will be dismissed without prejudice.

5

IT IS ORDERED:

6
7
8
9
10
11
12

(1)

The Clerk of Court must reassign these cases to the undersigned pursuant

to Local Rule of Civil Procedure 42.1(e)(3).
(2)

These cases are dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court must

file this Order in each case, enter judgment accordingly, and close these cases.
(3)

The Clerk of Court must accept no further documents for filing in

these cases, other than those in furtherance of an appeal.
DATED this 8th day of April, 2014.

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

first named Defendant in each case because entering onto the docket all of the Defendants
named in each lodged Complaint needlessly wastes the Court’s limited resources. The
Clerk of Court has made a notation on the docket that the list of defendants on the docket
sheet is only a partial list. Similarly, the Clerk of Court has also been directed to cease
sending Plaintiff a Notice of Assignment in each new case he files because Plaintiff’s
new lawsuits filed in the Tucson Division of the District of Arizona are initially directly
assigned to Chief Judge Collins, see Local Rule of Civil Procedure 3.8(e); given his
litigation history, Plaintiff is well aware of the warnings contained in the Notice of
Assignment; and sending a Notice of Assignment in each of Plaintiff’s new cases wastes
the Court’s limited resources.
-6-