Maisano v. Hoyt et al

Filing 3

ORDER REASSIGNING AND DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Case reassigned to Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield for all further proceedings. Judge Raner C Collins no longer assigned to case. Clerk must file this order in this case, enter judgment a ccordingly, and close the case. Clerk shall accept no further documents for filing in this case, other than those in furtherance of an appeal. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 4/8/2014. ( A copy of this document mailed to Dale Maisano on this date). (ADI-MLH, )

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 ORDER 9 10 Maisano v. Clark, et al. No. 14-01655-TUC-RCB 11 Maisano v. Clark, et al. No. 14-01656-TUC-RCB 12 Maisano v. Clark, et al. No. 14-01657-TUC-RCB 13 Maisano v. Brewer, et al. No. 14-01658-TUC-RCB 14 Maisano v. Towner, et al. No. 14-01659-TUC-RCB 15 Maisano v. Towner, et al. No. 14-01660-TUC-RCB 16 Maisano v. Towner, et al. No. 14-01661-TUC-RCB 17 Maisano v. Bonorand, et al. No. 14-01662-TUC-RCB 18 Maisano v. Bonorand, et al. No. 14-01663-TUC-RCB 19 Maisano v. Zevallos, et al. No. 14-01668-TUC-RCB 20 Maisano v. Zevallos, et al. No. 14-01669-TUC-RCB 21 Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01670-TUC-RCB 22 Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01671-TUC-RCB 23 Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01672-TUC-RCB 24 Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc. No. 14-01673-TUC-RCB 25 Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01674-TUC-RCB 26 Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01675-TUC-RCB 27 Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01676-TUC-RCB 28 Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01677-TUC-RCB 1 Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01678-TUC-RCB 2 Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01679-TUC-RCB 3 Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc. No. 14-01680-TUC-RCB 4 Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01681-TUC-RCB 5 Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc. No. 14-01682-TUC-RCB 6 Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01683-TUC-RCB 7 Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01684-TUC-RCB 8 Maisano v. Modrzejewski, et al. No. 14-01685-TUC-RCB 9 Maisano v. Modrzejewski, et al. No. 14-01686-TUC-RCB 10 Maisano v. Modrzejewski, et al. No. 14-01687-TUC-RCB 11 Maisano v. Modrzejewski, et al. No. 14-01688-TUC-RCB 12 Maisano v. Modrzejewski, et al. No. 14-01689-TUC-RCB 13 Maisano v. Modrzejewski, et al. No. 14-01690-TUC-RCB 14 Maisano v. Modrzejewski, et al. No. 14-01691-TUC-RCB Maisano v. Schroeder, et al. No. 14-01692-TUC-RCB Maisano v. Anderson, et al. No. 14-01693-TUC-RCB Maisano v. Bonorand, et al. No. 14-01694-TUC-RCB Maisano v. Bonorand, et al. No. 14-01695-TUC-RCB Maisano v. Deebom, et al. No. 14-01696-TUC-RCB Maisano v. Deebom, et al. No. 14-01697-TUC-RCB Maisano v. Clark, et al. No. 14-01698-TUC-RCB Maisano v. Clark, et al. No. 14-01699-TUC-RCB Maisano v. Clark, et al. No. 14-01700-TUC-RCB Maisano v. Clark, et al. No. 14-01701-TUC-RCB Maisano v. Clark, et al. No. 14-01702-TUC-RCB Maisano v. Clark, et al. No. 14-01703-TUC-RCB Maisano v. Clark, et al. No. 14-01704-TUC-RCB Maisano v. Clark, et al. No. 14-01705-TUC-RCB 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- 1 Maisano v. Clark, et al. No. 14-01706-TUC-RCB 2 Maisano v. Hoyt, et al. No. 14-01707-TUC-RCB 3 Maisano v. Hoyt, et al. No. 14-01708-TUC-RCB 4 Maisano v. Towner, et al. No. 14-01709-TUC-RCB 5 Maisano v. Towner, et al. No. 14-01710-TUC-RCB 6 Maisano v. Towner, et al. No. 14-01711-TUC-RCB 7 Maisano v. Trinity Grp./Canteen Food No. Servs., et al. 14-01712-TUC-RCB Maisano v. Trinity Grp./Canteen Food No. Servs., et al. 14-01713-TUC-RCB 10 Maisano v. Ryan, et al. No. 14-01714-TUC-RCB 11 Maisano v. Ryan, et al. No. 14-01715-TUC-RCB 12 Maisano v. Ryan, et al. No. 14-01716-TUC-RCB 13 Maisano v. Ryan, et al. No. 14-01717-TUC-RCB 14 Maisano v. Ryan, et al. No. 14-01718-TUC-RCB 15 Maisano v. Ryan, et al. No. 14-01719-TUC-RCB 16 Maisano v. Ryan, et al. No. 14-01720-TUC-RCB 17 Maisano v. Canteen/Trinity Corr. Food No. Servs. Inc. 14-01721-TUC-RCB Maisano v. Canteen/Trinity Corr. Food No. Servs. Inc. 14-01722-TUC-RCB 21 Maisano v. Canteen/Trinity Corr. Food No. Servs. Inc. 14-01723-TUC-RCB 22 Maisano v. Vega, et al. No. 14-01724-TUC-RCB 23 Maisano v. Vega, et al. No. 14-01725-TUC-RCB 24 Maisano v. Vega, et al. No. 14-01726-TUC-RCB 25 Maisano v. Vega, et al. No. 14-01727-TUC-RCB 26 Maisano v. Vega, et al. No. 14-01728-TUC-RCB 27 Maisano v. Vega, et al. No. 14-01729-TUC-RCB 28 Maisano v. Modrzejewski, et al. No. 14-01731-TUC-RCB 8 9 18 19 20 -3- 1 Maisano v. Modrzejewski, et al. No. 14-01732-TUC-RCB 2 Maisano v. Modrzejewski, et al. No. 14-01733-TUC-RCB 3 Maisano v. Modrzejewski, et al. No. 14-01734-TUC-RCB 4 Maisano v. Modrzejewski, et al. No. 14-01735-TUC-RCB 5 Maisano v. Modrzejewski, et al. No. 14-01736-TUC-RCB 6 Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc. No. 14-01737-TUC-RCB 7 Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc. No. 14-01738-TUC-RCB 8 Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc. No. 14-01739-TUC-RCB 9 Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01740-TUC-RCB 10 Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01741-TUC-RCB 11 Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01742-TUC-RCB 12 Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01744-TUC-RCB 13 Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01745-TUC-RCB 14 Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01746-TUC-RCB Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01747-TUC-RCB Maisano v. Corizon Health Inc., et al. No. 14-01748-TUC-RCB Maisano v. Clark, et al. No. 14-01749-TUC-RCB Maisano v. Clark, et al. No. 14-01750-TUC-RCB Maisano v. Clark, et al. No. 14-01751-TUC-RCB Maisano v. Clark, et al. No. 14-01752-TUC-RCB Maisano v. Clark, et al. No. 14-01753-TUC-RCB Maisano v. Clark, et al. No. 14-01754-TUC-RCB Maisano v. Clark, et al. No. 14-01755-TUC-RCB Maisano v. Trinity Grp./Canteen Food No. Servs., et al. 14-01756-TUC-RCB Maisano v. Trinity Grp./Canteen Food No. Servs., et al. 14-01757-TUC-RCB Maisano v. Canteen/Trinity Corr. Food No. Servs. Inc., et al. 14-01758-TUC-RCB 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Maisano v. Canteen/Trinity Corr. Food No. Servs. Inc., et al. 14-01759-TUC-RCB Maisano v. Ryan, et al. 14-01760-TUC-RCB No. With the undersigned’s consent, United States District Court Chief Judge Raner C. Collins has directed that the above-captioned cases be reassigned to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule of Civil Procedure 42.1(e)(3). Plaintiff Dale Maisano, who is confined in the Arizona State Prison ComplexLewis in Buckeye, Arizona, has so often and egregiously abused the legal process in the past that on August 11, 1992, Senior United States District Judge Stephen M. McNamee entered an Order and Restraining Order enjoining him from filing any civil action in this or any other federal court without first obtaining leave of the court. See August 11, 1992 Order and Restraining Order in Maisano v. Lewis, CV 92-1026-PHX-SMM (MS). Pursuant to the Restraining Order, to obtain leave to file, Plaintiff must file an “Application Pursuant to Court Order Seeking Leave to File” accompanied by an affidavit certifying: (1) “that the claim or claims he wishes to present are new and have never been raised and disposed of on the merits by any federal court”; and (2) “that to the best of his knowledge the claim or claims are not frivolous or taken in bad faith.” Additionally, any application seeking leave to file must be accompanied by a copy of the August 11, 1992 Order and Restraining Order in Maisano v. Lewis, CV 92-1026-PHXSMM (MS).1 In addition, Plaintiff “must attach to future complaints a list of all cases previously filed involving similar or related causes of action.” “Failure to comply strictly with the terms of the [Restraining Order] will be sufficient ground to deny leave to file.” (Emphasis added.) Plaintiff lodged a civil rights Complaint (Doc. 1)2 in each of the above-captioned cases. Plaintiff did not file an Application Pursuant to Court Order Seeking Leave to 1 Plaintiff appealed the final judgment in CV 92-1026-PHX-SMM (MS) to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. On March 17, 1993, the Court lodged a certified copy of the Ninth Circuit’s mandate dismissing the appeal. 2 In light of Plaintiff’s history of vexatious litigation and the frequency with which -5- 1 File, a copy of the August 11, 1992 Order and Restraining Order, or a list of his 2 previously filed cases involving similar or related causes of action. Plaintiff, therefore, 3 has failed to comply strictly with the Court-mandated pre-filing requirements. Thus, 4 these actions will be dismissed without prejudice. 5 IT IS ORDERED: 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 (1) The Clerk of Court must reassign these cases to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule of Civil Procedure 42.1(e)(3). (2) These cases are dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court must file this Order in each case, enter judgment accordingly, and close these cases. (3) The Clerk of Court must accept no further documents for filing in these cases, other than those in furtherance of an appeal. DATED this 8th day of April, 2014. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 he lodges complaints, the Clerk of Court has been directed to docket only the name of the first named Defendant in each case because entering onto the docket all of the Defendants named in each lodged Complaint needlessly wastes the Court’s limited resources. The Clerk of Court has made a notation on the docket that the list of defendants on the docket sheet is only a partial list. Similarly, the Clerk of Court has also been directed to cease sending Plaintiff a Notice of Assignment in each new case he files because Plaintiff’s new lawsuits filed in the Tucson Division of the District of Arizona are initially directly assigned to Chief Judge Collins, see Local Rule of Civil Procedure 3.8(e); given his litigation history, Plaintiff is well aware of the warnings contained in the Notice of Assignment; and sending a Notice of Assignment in each of Plaintiff’s new cases wastes the Court’s limited resources. -6-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?