Nietos v. Ryan et al
ORDER ADOPTING 19 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. IT IS ORDERED Petitioner's 11 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. A certificate of appealability is denied with respect to all grounds for relief asserted in this federal habeas action. Petitioner's 20 request for an extension of time to file another amended petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. This action is dismissed with prejudice and the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Senior Judge Frank R Zapata on 11/25/15.(BAC)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Charles Ryan, et al.,
Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United
States Magistrate Judge Rateau that recommends dismissing Petitioner Steven Nieto’s
Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [Doc. 11]. A review of the record reflects
that the parties have not filed any objections to the Report and Recommendation and that
the time to file objections has expired. As such, the Court will not consider any
objections or new evidence. The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that
Magistrate Judge Rateau’s recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. §
636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir.
1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). Accordingly, the
Court will adopt Magistrate Judge Rateau’s Report and Recommendation.
On November 23, 2015, Petitioner filed a “Notice of Extension of Time” wherein
Petitioner provides the Court with notice that he “need[s] 90 days to get [his] paperwork
right” to “file an Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus[.]” See Doc. 20. The Court
will construe Petitioner’s notice as a motion for an extension of time and, so construed,
the motion will be denied as moot.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
(1) Magistrate Judge Rateau’s Report and Recommendation [Doc. 19] is accepted
(2) Petitioner’s Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [Doc. 11] is denied;
(3) In accordance with Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the
United States District Courts, a certificate of appealability is denied with respect to all
grounds for relief asserted in this federal habeas action;
(4) Petitioner’s request for an extension of time to file another amended petition
for writ of habeas corpus [Doc. 20] is denied; and
(5) This action is dismissed with prejudice and the Clerk of the Court is directed to
close this case.
Dated this 25th day of November, 2015.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?