Finney v. Winn
Filing
24
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Velasco's 23 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED by this Court as the findings of fact and conclusions of law. IT IS ORDERED that the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice in favor of Defendant. A Final Judgment shall enter separately. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 3/30/15.(BAC)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
6
Maurice Finney,
7
Plaintiff,
8
vs.
9
Louis W. Winn, Jr.,
10
Defendant.
11
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CV-14-2029-TUC-DCB
ORDER
12
Magistrate Judge Velasco issued his Report and Recommendation on March 12, 2015,
13
recommending that the District Court deny and dismiss the Petition for Writ of Habeas
14
Corpus. A copy was sent to all parties on March 12, 2015, notifying all parties that written
15
objections must be filed within fourteen days of service. 28 U.S.C. §636(b). No objections
16
to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation have been filed. Consequently, any
17
objections that have not been raised are waived and will not be addressed by the Court.
18
The Court, having made an independent review of the record, orders as follows:
19
IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Velasco’s Report and Recommendation (Doc.
20
23) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED by this Court as the findings of fact and conclusions of
21
law.
22
IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED and
23
this action is dismissed with prejudice in favor of Defendant. A Final Judgment shall enter
24
separately.
25
26
27
28
DATED this 30th day of March, 2015.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?