Davis et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al

Filing 455

ORDER that the November 9, 2017 Report and Recommendation (Doc. 454 ) is ADOPTED. Defendant Crane Co.'s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 415 ) is GRANTED. Summary Judgment is awarded in favor of Defendant Crane Co. and against Plaintiffs B obby Len Davis and Becky Davis. Defendant Warren Pumps, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 421 ) is GRANTED. Summary Judgment is awarded in favor of Warren Pumps, LLC, and against Plaintiffs Bobby Len Davis and Becky Davis. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment and shall then close its file in this matter. Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 1/10/2018. (SIB)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 9 10 ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) Bobby Len Davis and Becky Davis, 11 12 13 14 15 No. CV 14-2288-TUC-CKJ (LCK) ORDER 16 On November 9, 2017, Magistrate Judge Lynette C. Kimmins issued a Report and 17 Recommendation (Doc. 454) in which she recommended Defendant Crane Co.’s Motion for 18 Summary Judgment (Doc. 415) and Defendant Warren Pumps, LLC’s Motion for Summary 19 Judgment (Doc. 421) be granted. The Report and Recommendation notified the parties they 20 had 14 days from the date of the Report and Recommendation to file any objections. No 21 objections have been filed. 22 The standard of review that is applied to a magistrate judge’s report and 23 recommendation is dependent upon whether a party files objections – the Court need not 24 review portions of a report to which a party does not object. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 25 150 (1985). However, the Court must “determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s 26 disposition that has been properly objected to. The district judge may accept, reject, or 27 modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the 28 magistrate judge with instructions.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3); see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 1 Nonetheless, “while the statute does not require the judge to review an issue de novo if no 2 objections are filed, it does not preclude further review by the district judge, sua sponte or 3 at the request of a party, under a de novo or any other standard.” Thomas, 474 U.S. at 154. 4 The Court has reviewed and considered the pending motions (Docs. 415, 421), the 5 responses (Docs. 431, 433), the replies (Docs. 445, 446), the statements of facts (Docs. 416, 6 422, 432, 434), and the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 454). 7 Accordingly, after an independent review, IT IS ORDERED: 8 1. The November 9, 2017 Report and Recommendation (Doc. 454) is ADOPTED. 9 2. Defendant Crane Co.’s Motion for 10 11 12 Summary Judgment (Doc. 415) is GRANTED. 3. Summary Judgment is awarded in favor of Defendant Crane Co. and against Plaintiffs Bobby Len Davis and Becky Davis. 13 4. 14 is GRANTED. 15 5. 16 17 18 19 Defendant Warren Pumps, LLC’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 421) Summary Judgment is awarded in favor of Warren Pumps, LLC, and against Plaintiffs Bobby Len Davis and Becky Davis. 6. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment and shall then close its file in this matter. DATED this 10th day of January, 2018. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?