Fultz v. McClintock
Filing
13
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 12 . Filipe Martinez, Warden, shall be substituted as Respondent for Susan McClintock. Petitioner's Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in Federal Custody (Doc. 1) is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case file in this matter. Signed by Judge Cindy K Jorgenson on 6/14/17. (See attached PDF for complete information.) (KAH)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Mario Denane Fultz,
Petitioner,
10
11
ORDER
v.
12
No. CV-14-02293-TUC-CKJ
Filipe Martinez, Warden,
13
Respondent.
14
15
On, May 5, 2017, Magistrate Judge Bruce G. Macdonald issued a Report and
16
Recommendation (Doc. 12) in which he recommended the Petition Under 28 U.S.C. §
17
2241 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) be denied. The Report and Recommendation
18
notified the parties they had 14 days from the date of the Report and Recommendation to
19
file any objections. No objections have been filed.
20
The standard of review that is applied to a magistrate judge’s report and
21
recommendation is dependent upon whether a party files objections – the Court need not
22
review portions of a report to which a party does not object. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S.
23
140, 150 (1985). However, the Court must “determine de novo any part of the magistrate
24
judge’s disposition that has been properly objected to. The district judge may accept,
25
reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the
26
matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3); see also 28
27
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Nonetheless, “while the statute does not require the judge to review
28
an issue de novo if no objections are filed, it does not preclude further review by the
1
district judge, sua sponte or at the request of a party, under a de novo or any other
2
standard.” Thomas, 474 U.S. at 154.
3
4
5
The Court has reviewed and considered the pending petition (Doc. 1), the response
(Doc. 9), and the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 12).
Accordingly, after an independent review, IT IS ORDERED:
6
1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 50) is ADOPTED.
7
2. Filipe Martinez, Warden, shall be substituted as Respondent for Susan McClintock
8
pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rule 43(c)(2)
9
of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; and
10
11
12
13
14
15
3. Petitioner’s Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a
Person in Federal Custody (Doc. 1) is DENIED.
4. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case file in
this matter.
Dated this 14th day of June, 2017.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?