Degginger v. McGraw-Hill Global Education Holdings LLC
Filing
33
ORDER ADOPTING 32 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by this Court as the findings of fact and conclusions of law. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' 28 Motion to Dismiss Count 2 of the Complaint is GRANTED. No judgment shall enter at this juncture. This action is referred back to the Magistrate Judge to continue pretrial management. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 3/2/15.(BAC)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
6
Phil Degginger,
7
Plaintiff,
8
vs.
9
McGraw-Hill Global Education
Holdings LLC, et al.,
10
Defendants.
11
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CV-14-2429-TUC-DCB (DTF)
ORDER
12
13
Magistrate Judge Ferraro issued his Report and Recommendation on February 11,
14
2015, recommending that the District Court grant the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
15
Plaintiff’s Count 2 of the Complaint. A copy was sent to all parties, notifying all parties that
16
written objections must be filed within fourteen days of service. 28 U.S.C. §636(b). No
17
objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation have been filed.
18
Consequently, any objections that have not been raised are waived and will not be addressed
19
by the Court.
20
The Court, having made an independent review of the record, orders as follows:
21
IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Ferraro’s Report and Recommendation (Doc.
22
32) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED by this Court as the findings of fact and conclusions of
23
law.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Count 2 of the
24
25
Complaint (Doc. 28) is GRANTED. No judgment shall enter at this juncture.
26
//
27
//
28
1
2
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is referred back to the Magistrate Judge
to continue pretrial management.
DATED this 2nd day of March, 2015.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?