Degginger v. McGraw-Hill Global Education Holdings LLC

Filing 33

ORDER ADOPTING 32 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by this Court as the findings of fact and conclusions of law. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' 28 Motion to Dismiss Count 2 of the Complaint is GRANTED. No judgment shall enter at this juncture. This action is referred back to the Magistrate Judge to continue pretrial management. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 3/2/15.(BAC)

1
2
3
4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

6

Phil Degginger,

7

Plaintiff,

8

vs.

9

McGraw-Hill Global Education
Holdings LLC, et al.,

10

Defendants.

11

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CV-14-2429-TUC-DCB (DTF)
ORDER

12
13

Magistrate Judge Ferraro issued his Report and Recommendation on February 11,

14

2015, recommending that the District Court grant the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss

15

Plaintiff’s Count 2 of the Complaint. A copy was sent to all parties, notifying all parties that

16

written objections must be filed within fourteen days of service. 28 U.S.C. §636(b). No

17

objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation have been filed.

18

Consequently, any objections that have not been raised are waived and will not be addressed

19

by the Court.

20

The Court, having made an independent review of the record, orders as follows:

21

IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Ferraro’s Report and Recommendation (Doc.

22

32) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED by this Court as the findings of fact and conclusions of

23

law.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Count 2 of the

24
25

Complaint (Doc. 28) is GRANTED. No judgment shall enter at this juncture.

26

//

27

//

28

1
2
3

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is referred back to the Magistrate Judge
to continue pretrial management.
DATED this 2nd day of March, 2015.

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2