Taylor v. Pima, County of et al

Filing 258

ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Supplement Third Amended Complaint (Doc. 246 ) is granted, nunc pro tunc. Plaintiff's Supplemented TAC (Doc. 251 ) is considered properly filed. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 7/30/2021. (ARC)

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

Louis Taylor,

No. CV-15-00152-TUC-RM
Plaintiff,

10
11

v.

12

ORDER

County of Pima, et al.,

13

Defendants.

14
15

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Supplement Third

16

Amended Complaint (“TAC”),1 in which Plaintiff seeks leave pursuant to Federal Rule of

17

Civil Procedure 15(d) to supplement his TAC with allegations concerning events that

18

occurred after Plaintiff moved for leave to file the TAC. (Doc. 246.) Defendants

19

responded, stating that they do not concede that Plaintiff’s supplemental allegations

20

satisfy Rule 15(d) but that, in the interests of fairness and judicial economy, they do not

21

oppose Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave and instead plan to file a motion to dismiss and/or

22

strike.

23

Supplemented TAC. (Doc. 251.)

(Doc. 249.)

After Defendants filed their Response, Plaintiff filed his

24

“On motion and reasonable notice, the court may, on just terms, permit a party to

25

serve a supplemental pleading setting out any transaction, occurrence, or event that

26

happened after the date of the pleading to be supplemented.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(d).
Pursuant to Rule 15(d), and there being no objection,

27
28
1

Other pending motions will be resolved separately.

1

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Supplement Third

2

Amended Complaint (Doc. 246) is granted, nunc pro tunc. Plaintiff’s Supplemented

3

TAC (Doc. 251) is considered properly filed.

4

Dated this 30th day of July, 2021.

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2-