Johnson v. Kaczynski et al

Filing 7

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER (see Order for Details). Signed by Judge James A Soto on 5/1/15.

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

Ronald Johnson,
Plaintiff,

10
11

vs.

12
Brett Kaczynski, et al.
13
Defendants.
14

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. CV 15-168-TUC-JAS
ORDER

15
16

*PLAINTIFF(S) SHALL FILE A NOTICE WITH THE COURT WHEN ALL PARTIES

17

HAVE BEEN SERVED OR THIS CASE IS OTHERWISE READY TO PROCEED TO

18

THE NEXT STEP OF THE LITIGATION (i.e., a Joint Report from the parties and a

19

Scheduling Order from the Court).

20

Communication with the Court

21

To avoid the appearance of impropriety by the Court or the parties and to preserve a

22

proper record in the event of any appeal, all communication with the Court shall occur via

23

a written motion filed into the official docket. The parties shall not contact the Court’s staff

24

(i.e., Law Clerks or the Judicial Assistant) telephonically or by e-mail to ask questions or

25

express concerns regarding cases pending before the Court, and the Court has directed its

26

staff not to entertain any such informal communication. While the parties may give the

27

Court’s staff a courtesy call to give them notice of an emergency motion, settlement, or last-

28

minute stipulation to adjust deadlines, all other communication with the Court shall occur via

1

a written motion. For example, if there is a discovery dispute, the parties shall not contact

2

the Court telephonically to resolve the dispute; the parties shall file a motion in compliance

3

with the Local Rules if they are unable to resolve the dispute.

4

Dispositive Motions

5

A motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) is discouraged if the defect can be cured by

6

filing an amended pleading. Therefore, the parties must confer prior to the filing of a motion

7

to dismiss to determine whether it can be avoided. Motions to dismiss must be accompanied

8

by a notice of certification of conferral indicating that the parties have conferred to determine

9

whether an amendment could cure a deficient pleading, and have been unable to agree that

10

the pleading is curable by a permissible amendment. In addition, parties shall endeavor not

11

to oppose motions to amend that are filed prior to the Scheduling Conference or within the

12

time set forth in the Rule 16 Case Management Order. Motions to dismiss that do not

13

contain the required certification may be stricken by the Court.

14

A party filing a dispositive motion shall file only one dispositive motion which

15

incorporates all relevant arguments. The dispositive motion shall be limited to 17 pages as

16

required by LRCiv 7.2(e); responses are limited to 17 pages and replies are limited to 11

17

pages. See LRCiv 7.2(e). Parties are prohibited from simultaneously filing multiple

18

dispositive motions directed at separate counts or issues in a case. While it is proper to file

19

one motion to dismiss early in the litigation and one motion for summary judgment after

20

discovery has been completed, it is not proper to simultaneously file multiple motions to

21

dismiss or multiple motions for summary judgment directed to separate counts or issues. The

22

parties should raise all of their arguments for dismissal in one motion to dismiss as early as

23

possible in the case, and raise all of their arguments for dismissal in one motion for summary

24

judgment after discovery has closed. The Court views the filing of such multiple motions

25

as an attempt to subvert the Local Civil Rules establishing page limits which encourage the

26

parties to be concise in their arguments; if necessary, the parties may seek leave to exceed

27

page limits to include all of their arguments in one motion to dismiss or one motion for

28

summary judgment. Furthermore, filing successive motions to dismiss or motions for
-2-

1

summary judgment after the Court has already resolved such a motion is extremely

2

inefficient and often causes long and unnecessary delays as a case is essentially halted during

3

the period between the filing of a dispositive motion and the Court's ultimate ruling on a

4

dispositive motion after it has been fully briefed. If a party files a successive motion to

5

dismiss or motion for summary judgment after such a motion has been resolved by the Court,

6

the successive motion to dismiss or motion for summary judgment will likely be summarily

7

denied as a motion for reconsideration. The Court also notes that if a party files an early

8

summary judgment motion before discovery has closed, the Court will likely grant an

9

opposing party's request to complete necessary discovery to properly oppose the motion; in

10

such circumstances, the early motion for summary judgment would be denied without

11

prejudice pending completion of necessary discovery. In light of the foregoing, the parties

12

should strive to include all of their arguments in one motion to dismiss early in the case and

13

one motion for summary judgment upon the close of discovery.

14

Proposed Orders, Paper Copies, Exhibits, Authority Binders, and Emailing Documents

15

The parties must file a proposed order with any motion or stipulation filed with the Court

16

and such documents must comply with the applicable requirements in the local rules. See,

17

e.g., LRCiv 5.4, 5.5, 7.1, 7.2; Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures

18

Manual in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona ("Manual"). All

19

proposed orders must be emailed to chambers ([e-mail]) in either

20

Word or Word Perfect format. See id.; Manual at 12-13 (describing pertinent e-filing

21

procedures in detail). In addition, if a motion is opposed, the opposing party shall file and

22

email to chambers a proposed order denying the motion. To the extent the parties file any

23

motions, responses, or replies as to substantive matters (such as motions for: injunctive relief,

24

to dismiss, for summary judgment, to compel, sanctions, etc.), the parties shall email Word

25

or Word Perfect copies of the motions, responses, or replies to chambers. Lastly, the parties

26

shall also email Word or Word Perfect copies of any separate statement of facts in support

27

of, or in opposition to, summary judgment or other dispositive motions.

28

Paper copies of all filings must be mailed (except as noted below) to chambers (LRCiv
-3-

1

5.4); any motion, pleading, or other document which is submitted with more than one exhibit

2

must be accompanied by a Table of Contents and the exhibits must be indexed with tabs

3

which correspond to the Table of Contents. Anytime a party files a motion, response, reply,

4

or other brief with the Court, the party must mail the Court paper copies of all authority cited

5

in the brief which shall be included in a binder with a table of contents and exhibit tags

6

corresponding to the authority cited. Such authority includes, but is not limited to, case law,

7

rules, statutes, regulations, and treatises.

8

regulations are cited, the entire case, rule, statute or regulation shall be included in the binder.

9

The case law shall be organized in alphabetical order. To the extent treatises are cited, only

10

the section(s) relied upon shall be included in the binder. As to all of the authority cited

11

which must be included in the binder, the parties shall also tag (with a post-it) the specific

12

page(s) cited in their briefs and highlight (by circling with a pen or using a highlighter) the

13

portion of the case, rule, statute, regulation, or treatise that supports the citations of authority

14

relied upon in their briefs. Within seven days after a document is filed, the parties shall

15

provide the Court with paper copies in strict compliance with this Order and file a notice that

16

they have strictly complied with the requirements in this Order; failure to timely file this

17

required notice will be viewed as a party's admission that they have failed to comply with this

18

Court's Order.1 If an emergency motion is filed (including, but not limited to, a motion for

19

a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction, emergency stay, or other motion that

20

warrants expedited action) that requires more immediate attention from the Court, the parties

21

shall provide the required paper copies no later than one business day (or sooner if possible)

22

after the motion, response or reply is filed pertaining to any emergency motion. If a party

23

fails to submit the required authority binder and other paper copies required by this Order2,

To the extent case law, rules, statutes, or

24
25
26
27
28

1

The parties are not required to provide paper copies of stipulations and unopposed motions
to continue, and need not provide authority binders as to stipulations and unopposed motions to
continue.
2

On rare occasions, the Court may find it necessary to issue an Order before the deadline to
the submit the required binders expires; in these circumstances, the binder requirement becomes

-4-

1

the Court may summarily deny or grant a motion as applicable to the party that failed to

2

comply with this Order, and the Court may dismiss the case with prejudice or enter a default

3

judgment as to the non-complying party.3

4

Plaintiffs shall serve a copy of this Order on Defendants at the same time they serve the

5

Summons and Complaint; if these have already been served on Defendants prior to Plaintiffs

6

receiving this Order, Plaintiffs shall serve this Order on Defendants within 14 days of the

7

filing date of this Order. Within 7 days of serving this Order on Defendants, Plaintiffs shall

8

file a notice with the Court indicating when Defendant was served with this Order. If all

9

parties have already been served and entered an appearance into the record, Plaintiff need not

10

serve this Order as they will receive either a Notice of Electronic Filing through CM/ECF

11

or a paper copy (for pro se parties) of this Order through the Clerk of the Court.

12

DATED this 1st day of May, 2015.

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

moot, and the parties are not required to submit binders.
3

As to pro se parties, the Court notes that the full text of most legal authority is available via
numerous internet sites, including Google Scholar (http://scholar.google.com/), which is available
to the public and completely free. In addition, most legal authority can be found and copied for a
limited charge in various libraries located in most cities such as the law libraries located at the
University of Arizona College of Law and the various courthouses in Pima County. Legal authority
can also be found and printed out for a limited charge at sites such as westlaw.com and lexis.com.

-5-