Johnson v. Kaczynski et al

Filing 7

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER (see Order for Details). Signed by Judge James A Soto on 5/1/15.

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Ronald Johnson, Plaintiff, 10 11 vs. 12 Brett Kaczynski, et al. 13 Defendants. 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 15-168-TUC-JAS ORDER 15 16 *PLAINTIFF(S) SHALL FILE A NOTICE WITH THE COURT WHEN ALL PARTIES 17 HAVE BEEN SERVED OR THIS CASE IS OTHERWISE READY TO PROCEED TO 18 THE NEXT STEP OF THE LITIGATION (i.e., a Joint Report from the parties and a 19 Scheduling Order from the Court). 20 Communication with the Court 21 To avoid the appearance of impropriety by the Court or the parties and to preserve a 22 proper record in the event of any appeal, all communication with the Court shall occur via 23 a written motion filed into the official docket. The parties shall not contact the Court’s staff 24 (i.e., Law Clerks or the Judicial Assistant) telephonically or by e-mail to ask questions or 25 express concerns regarding cases pending before the Court, and the Court has directed its 26 staff not to entertain any such informal communication. While the parties may give the 27 Court’s staff a courtesy call to give them notice of an emergency motion, settlement, or last- 28 minute stipulation to adjust deadlines, all other communication with the Court shall occur via 1 a written motion. For example, if there is a discovery dispute, the parties shall not contact 2 the Court telephonically to resolve the dispute; the parties shall file a motion in compliance 3 with the Local Rules if they are unable to resolve the dispute. 4 Dispositive Motions 5 A motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) is discouraged if the defect can be cured by 6 filing an amended pleading. Therefore, the parties must confer prior to the filing of a motion 7 to dismiss to determine whether it can be avoided. Motions to dismiss must be accompanied 8 by a notice of certification of conferral indicating that the parties have conferred to determine 9 whether an amendment could cure a deficient pleading, and have been unable to agree that 10 the pleading is curable by a permissible amendment. In addition, parties shall endeavor not 11 to oppose motions to amend that are filed prior to the Scheduling Conference or within the 12 time set forth in the Rule 16 Case Management Order. Motions to dismiss that do not 13 contain the required certification may be stricken by the Court. 14 A party filing a dispositive motion shall file only one dispositive motion which 15 incorporates all relevant arguments. The dispositive motion shall be limited to 17 pages as 16 required by LRCiv 7.2(e); responses are limited to 17 pages and replies are limited to 11 17 pages. See LRCiv 7.2(e). Parties are prohibited from simultaneously filing multiple 18 dispositive motions directed at separate counts or issues in a case. While it is proper to file 19 one motion to dismiss early in the litigation and one motion for summary judgment after 20 discovery has been completed, it is not proper to simultaneously file multiple motions to 21 dismiss or multiple motions for summary judgment directed to separate counts or issues. The 22 parties should raise all of their arguments for dismissal in one motion to dismiss as early as 23 possible in the case, and raise all of their arguments for dismissal in one motion for summary 24 judgment after discovery has closed. The Court views the filing of such multiple motions 25 as an attempt to subvert the Local Civil Rules establishing page limits which encourage the 26 parties to be concise in their arguments; if necessary, the parties may seek leave to exceed 27 page limits to include all of their arguments in one motion to dismiss or one motion for 28 summary judgment. Furthermore, filing successive motions to dismiss or motions for -2- 1 summary judgment after the Court has already resolved such a motion is extremely 2 inefficient and often causes long and unnecessary delays as a case is essentially halted during 3 the period between the filing of a dispositive motion and the Court's ultimate ruling on a 4 dispositive motion after it has been fully briefed. If a party files a successive motion to 5 dismiss or motion for summary judgment after such a motion has been resolved by the Court, 6 the successive motion to dismiss or motion for summary judgment will likely be summarily 7 denied as a motion for reconsideration. The Court also notes that if a party files an early 8 summary judgment motion before discovery has closed, the Court will likely grant an 9 opposing party's request to complete necessary discovery to properly oppose the motion; in 10 such circumstances, the early motion for summary judgment would be denied without 11 prejudice pending completion of necessary discovery. In light of the foregoing, the parties 12 should strive to include all of their arguments in one motion to dismiss early in the case and 13 one motion for summary judgment upon the close of discovery. 14 Proposed Orders, Paper Copies, Exhibits, Authority Binders, and Emailing Documents 15 The parties must file a proposed order with any motion or stipulation filed with the Court 16 and such documents must comply with the applicable requirements in the local rules. See, 17 e.g., LRCiv 5.4, 5.5, 7.1, 7.2; Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures 18 Manual in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona ("Manual"). All 19 proposed orders must be emailed to chambers ( in either 20 Word or Word Perfect format. See id.; Manual at 12-13 (describing pertinent e-filing 21 procedures in detail). In addition, if a motion is opposed, the opposing party shall file and 22 email to chambers a proposed order denying the motion. To the extent the parties file any 23 motions, responses, or replies as to substantive matters (such as motions for: injunctive relief, 24 to dismiss, for summary judgment, to compel, sanctions, etc.), the parties shall email Word 25 or Word Perfect copies of the motions, responses, or replies to chambers. Lastly, the parties 26 shall also email Word or Word Perfect copies of any separate statement of facts in support 27 of, or in opposition to, summary judgment or other dispositive motions. 28 Paper copies of all filings must be mailed (except as noted below) to chambers (LRCiv -3- 1 5.4); any motion, pleading, or other document which is submitted with more than one exhibit 2 must be accompanied by a Table of Contents and the exhibits must be indexed with tabs 3 which correspond to the Table of Contents. Anytime a party files a motion, response, reply, 4 or other brief with the Court, the party must mail the Court paper copies of all authority cited 5 in the brief which shall be included in a binder with a table of contents and exhibit tags 6 corresponding to the authority cited. Such authority includes, but is not limited to, case law, 7 rules, statutes, regulations, and treatises. 8 regulations are cited, the entire case, rule, statute or regulation shall be included in the binder. 9 The case law shall be organized in alphabetical order. To the extent treatises are cited, only 10 the section(s) relied upon shall be included in the binder. As to all of the authority cited 11 which must be included in the binder, the parties shall also tag (with a post-it) the specific 12 page(s) cited in their briefs and highlight (by circling with a pen or using a highlighter) the 13 portion of the case, rule, statute, regulation, or treatise that supports the citations of authority 14 relied upon in their briefs. Within seven days after a document is filed, the parties shall 15 provide the Court with paper copies in strict compliance with this Order and file a notice that 16 they have strictly complied with the requirements in this Order; failure to timely file this 17 required notice will be viewed as a party's admission that they have failed to comply with this 18 Court's Order.1 If an emergency motion is filed (including, but not limited to, a motion for 19 a temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction, emergency stay, or other motion that 20 warrants expedited action) that requires more immediate attention from the Court, the parties 21 shall provide the required paper copies no later than one business day (or sooner if possible) 22 after the motion, response or reply is filed pertaining to any emergency motion. If a party 23 fails to submit the required authority binder and other paper copies required by this Order2, To the extent case law, rules, statutes, or 24 25 26 27 28 1 The parties are not required to provide paper copies of stipulations and unopposed motions to continue, and need not provide authority binders as to stipulations and unopposed motions to continue. 2 On rare occasions, the Court may find it necessary to issue an Order before the deadline to the submit the required binders expires; in these circumstances, the binder requirement becomes -4- 1 the Court may summarily deny or grant a motion as applicable to the party that failed to 2 comply with this Order, and the Court may dismiss the case with prejudice or enter a default 3 judgment as to the non-complying party.3 4 Plaintiffs shall serve a copy of this Order on Defendants at the same time they serve the 5 Summons and Complaint; if these have already been served on Defendants prior to Plaintiffs 6 receiving this Order, Plaintiffs shall serve this Order on Defendants within 14 days of the 7 filing date of this Order. Within 7 days of serving this Order on Defendants, Plaintiffs shall 8 file a notice with the Court indicating when Defendant was served with this Order. If all 9 parties have already been served and entered an appearance into the record, Plaintiff need not 10 serve this Order as they will receive either a Notice of Electronic Filing through CM/ECF 11 or a paper copy (for pro se parties) of this Order through the Clerk of the Court. 12 DATED this 1st day of May, 2015. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 moot, and the parties are not required to submit binders. 3 As to pro se parties, the Court notes that the full text of most legal authority is available via numerous internet sites, including Google Scholar (, which is available to the public and completely free. In addition, most legal authority can be found and copied for a limited charge in various libraries located in most cities such as the law libraries located at the University of Arizona College of Law and the various courthouses in Pima County. Legal authority can also be found and printed out for a limited charge at sites such as and -5-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?