Grasdalen v. Shartle

Filing 33

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Petitioner Grasdalen's Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (doc. 10 ) is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Petitioner's Motion for Order re: Gratuities (doc. 26 ) and Motion to Comply (doc. 28 ) are DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss Petition (doc. 30 ) is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 8/3/2016. (DPS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 7 8 Keith Allen Grasdalen, 9 No. CV 15-0299-TUC-JGZ (BGM) Petitioner, 10 v. 11 J.T. Shartle, ORDER 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Respondent. Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States Magistrate Judge Bruce G. Macdonald that recommends dismissing Petitioner Grasdalen’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, dismissing Petitioner’s Motion Seeking Gratuities, dismissing Petitioner’s Motion for Compliance Regarding Gratuities, and denying Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss Petition. (Doc. 31.) No objection to the Report and Recommendation was filed by Petitioner.1 “When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, Adv. Comm. Notes to 1983 Am. The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Macdonald’s recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); see also Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). As explained by 25 26 27 28 1 The Court notes that Petitioner did not receive the Report and Recommendation, which was sent to Plaintiff at USP-Tucson on May 31, 2016, but was returned as undeliverable. Petitioner was released from Bureau of Prisons custody on April 14, 2016. See BOP Inmate Locator, available at https://www.bop.gov/inmateloc/. Petitioner has a duty to file a notice of change of address with the Court, but since his release has not done so. (Doc. 9, p. 3.) 1 Magistrate Judge Macdonald, this Court lacks jurisdiction to review discretionary 2 determinations made by the Bureau of Prisons pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3621-3624. Reeb 3 v. Thomas, 636 F.3d 1224, 1226-27 (9th Cir. 2011); see 18 U.S.C. § 3625. 4 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 5 1. The Report and Recommendation (doc. 31) is accepted and adopted; 6 2. Petitioner Grasdalen’s Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (doc. 10) 7 8 is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction; 3. 9 Petitioner’s Motion for Order re: Gratuities (doc. 26) and Motion to Comply (doc. 28) are DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction; 10 4. Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss Petition (doc. 30) is DENIED; 11 5. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. 12 13 Dated this 3rd day of August, 2016. 14 15 16 Honorable Jennifer G. Zipps United States District Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?