Strausbaugh v. Shartle

Filing 38

ORDER accepting and adopting 31 Magistrate Judge Rateau's Report and Recommendation. The Petition is denied and this case is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the file in this case. Signed by Judge James A Soto on 7/13/2017. (DPS)

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

3
4

Michael Strausbaugh,

5

Petitioner,

6

vs.

7
J.T. Shartle,
8
Respondent.
9

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. CV 15-398-TUC-JAS (JR)
ORDER

10
11

Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge

12

Rateau. In the Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Rateau recommends denying

13

the Petition and dismissing this case with prejudice. As the Court finds that the Report and

14

Recommendation appropriately resolved this matter, Petitioner’s objections are denied.1

15

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

16

(1) Magistrate Judge Rateau’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 31) is accepted and

17

adopted.

18

(2) The Petition is denied and this case is dismissed with prejudice.

19

(3) The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the file in this case.

20

DATED this 13th day of July, 2017.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

The Court reviews de novo the objected-to portions of the Report and Recommendation.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The Court reviews for clear error the unobjected-to
portions of the Report and Recommendation. See Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734,
739 (7th Cir. 1999); see also Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998).