Valencia v. Maxwell et al

Filing 70

ORDER that the Defendants are granted summary judgment on the policy claim against the City of Tucson; the City of Tucson is dismissed from this action. It is further Ordered that 30 days from the filing date of this Order, the parties shall file the Joint Pretrial Order (see attached Order for complete details). Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 3/19/2019. (MFR)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Alberto Arellano Valencia, Plaintiff, 10 11 ORDER v. 12 No. CV-15-00499-TUC-DCB Brandon Maxwell, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 There being no showing of cause for the Court to not dismiss the policy claim 16 against the City of Tucson, as noticed in the Court’s Order issued January 10, 2019, the 17 Court will grant summary judgment for the City of Tucson on the policy claim alleged in 18 Count Two. 19 The Court denied in part the Defendants’ dispositive motion on January 10, 2019, 20 and appointed counsel for Plaintiff. This case is ready for trial. If desired, the parties 21 should immediately consider settlement and are reminded that a settlement conference may 22 be held before a Magistrate Judge. If the parties are interested in attending a settlement 23 conference, they should contact this Court’s law clerk, Greer Barkley, at 520 205-4560 for 24 scheduling information. In the event the parties do not wish to attempt to settle this case, 25 the Joint Pretrial Order shall be filed and, thereafter, the Court will set a Pretrial Conference 26 which is when the trial date will be set. 27 This case is trial ready for Plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment claim alleged in Count I 28 of the Second Amended Complaint alleging excessive use of force while Plaintiff was 1 seated in the cab. The remainder of the claim regarding the use of force by Defendants 2 after he exited the cab is Heck barred. (Order (Doc. 68) at 9-12 (discussing Heck v. 3 Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994)). 4 Accordingly, 5 IT IS ORDERED that the Defendants are granted summary judgment on the policy 6 claim against the City of Tucson; the City of Tucson is dismissed from this action. 7 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 30 days from the filing date of this Order, the 8 parties shall file the Joint Pretrial Order. See (Scheduling Order (Doc. 21) at Attachment: 9 Form of Pretrial Order). 10 Dated this 19th day of March, 2019. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?