Gardner v. Shartle
ORDER that Magistrate Judge Markovich's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 16 ) is accepted and adopted. It is further Ordered the §2241 petition is denied, the request for submission and judgment (Doc. 15 ) is denied, and this case is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the file in this case. Signed by Judge James A Soto on 9/18/2017. (MFR)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Bryan James Gardner,
No. CV 16-302-TUC-JAS (EJM)
Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge
Markovich. As the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation appropriately resolved
the §2241 petition, the objections are denied.1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
(1) Magistrate Judge Markovich’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 16) is accepted and
(2) The §2241 petition is denied, the request for submission and judgment (Doc. 15) is
denied, and this case is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall enter
judgment and close the file in this case.
DATED this 18th day of September, 2017.
The Court reviews de novo the objected-to portions of the Report and Recommendation.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The Court reviews for clear error the unobjected-to
portions of the Report and Recommendation. See Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734,
739 (7th Cir. 1999); see also Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998).
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?