Espinoza v. Stevens et al

Filing 67

ORDERED that the 66 Motion for Reconsideration seeking appointment of counsel and complaining about Defendants hindering litigation of this and other cases is denied. It is further ordered that within 7 days of the filing date of this Order the Defendants shall file a Notice of Compliance with the directives of this Court given on July 5, 2019, to provide copies of documents to the Plaintiff. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 7/25/2019. (BAR)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 6 7 Adrien Joshua Espinoza, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 11 No. CV-16-00561-TUC-DCB ORDER v. Unknown Stevens, et al., Defendants. 12 13 14 Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is fully briefed and taken under advisement. (Order (Doc. 63)). 15 Accordingly, 16 IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 66) seeking 17 appointment of counsel and complaining about Defendants hindering litigation of this and 18 other cases is DENIED. 19 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within 7 days of the filing date of this Order 20 the Defendants shall file a Notice of Compliance with the directives of this Court given on 21 July 5, 2019, (Doc. 63) to provide copies of documents to the Plaintiff. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated this 25th day of July, 2019.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?