D'Amario v. United States of America
Filing
24
ORDER that Magistrate Judge Rateau's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 21 ) is accepted and adopted. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 8 ), which was converted into a Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 14 ), is granted and this matter is dismissed. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close the case file. Signed by Judge James A Soto on 9/6/2017. (SIB)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
7
8
9
Arthur D’Amario III,
Plaintiff,
10
11
vs.
12
United States of America,
13
Defendant.
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV 16-0639-TUC-JAS (JR)
ORDER
15
16
Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by Magistrate Judge
17
Jacqueline M. Rateau. In the Report and Recommendation, Magistrate Judge Rateau
18
recommends that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 8) be granted. As the Court finds
19
that the Report and Recommendation appropriately resolved the Defendant’s Motion to
20
Dismiss (Doc. 8), the objection is denied.1
21
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
22
(1) Magistrate Judge Rateau’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 21) is accepted and
23
adopted.
24
(2) Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 8), which was converted into a Motion for
25
26
27
28
1
The Court reviews de novo the objected-to portions of the Report and Recommendation.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The Court reviews for clear error the unobjected-to
portions of the Report and Recommendation. See Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734,
739 (7th Cir. 1999); see also Conley v. Crabtree, 14 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998).
1
Summary Judgment (Doc. 14), is granted and this matter is dismissed.
2
(3) The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close the case file.
3
DATED this 6th day of September, 2017.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?