Blaylock v. United States of America

Filing 11

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING IN FULL 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's 1 Complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. Within 30 days from the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff shall file a First Amended Complaint w hich cures the deficiencies outlined in Judge Kimmins's Report and Recommendation. If Plaintiff fails to file a First Amended Complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court is directed to dismiss this action without prejudice, without further notice to Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 5/16/17.(BAC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Zackery Blaylock, Plaintiff, 10 11 ORDER v. 12 No. CV-17-00006-TUC-RM (LCK) United States of America, 13 Defendant. 14 15 On April 12, 2017, Magistrate Judge Lynnette C. Kimmins issued a Report and 16 Recommendation (Doc. 9) recommending that this Court dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint 17 with leave to amend, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii). No objections to 18 the Report and Recommendation were filed. 19 A district judge must “make a de novo determination of those portions” of a 20 magistrate judge’s “report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which 21 objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The advisory committee’s notes to Rule 22 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure state that, “[w]hen no timely objection is 23 filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record 24 in order to accept the recommendation” of a magistrate judge. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) 25 advisory committee’s note to 1983 addition. See also Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 26 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999) (“If no objection or only partial objection is made, the 27 district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.”); Prior v. Ryan, 28 CV 10-225-TUC-RCC, 2012 WL 1344286, at *1 (D. Ariz. Apr. 18, 2012) (reviewing for 1 clear error unobjected-to portions of Report and Recommendation). 2 The Court has reviewed Judge Kimmins’s Report and Recommendation, the 3 parties’ briefs, and the record. The Court finds no error in Judge Kimmins’s Report and 4 Recommendation. Accordingly, 5 6 IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 9) is accepted and adopted in full. 7 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. 1) is dismissed 8 with leave to amend, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii). Within 30 days 9 from the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff shall file a First Amended Complaint which 10 cures the deficiencies outlined in Judge Kimmins’s Report and Recommendation. If 11 Plaintiff fails to file a First Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days, the Clerk of 12 Court is directed to dismiss this action without prejudice, without further notice to 13 Plaintiff. 14 Dated this 16th day of May, 2017. 15 16 17 Honorable Rosemary Márquez United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?