Akard v. Shartle

Filing 19

ORDER accepting and adopting 18 Magistrate Judge Bowman's Report and Recommendation. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1 ) is DENIED and this action is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk's Office is directed to enter a Final Judgment separately. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 11/20/2017. (DPS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 Jeffrey E. Akard, 9 Petitioner, 10 vs. 11 J.T. Shartle, 12 Respondent. 13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CV-17-271-TUC-DCB ORDER 14 15 Magistrate Judge Bowman issued her Report and Recommendation on November 1, 16 2017, recommending that the District Court deny the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 17 dismiss the action with prejudice. A copy was sent to all parties, notifying all parties that 18 written objections must be filed within fourteen days of service. 28 U.S.C. §636(b). No 19 objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation have been filed. 20 Consequently, any objections that have not been raised are waived and will not be addressed 21 by the Court. 22 The Court, having made an independent review of the record, orders as follows: 23 IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Bowman’s Report and Recommendation 24 (Doc. No. 18) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED by this Court as the findings of fact and 25 conclusions of law. IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED 26 27 28 /// 1 and this action is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk’s Office is directed to enter a Final 2 Judgment separately. 3 DATED this 20th day of November, 2017. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?