Garang v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Filing
24
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 23 Report and Recommendation. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this matter is remanded to the Commissioner for an award of benefits; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Senior Judge Frank R Zapata on 5/28/2019. (See attached Order for details) (KEP)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Yak O. Garang,
No. CV 18-134-TUC-FRZ
Plaintiffs,
10
11
v.
12
ORDER
Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting
Commissioner of the Social Security
Administration,
13
14
Defendant.
15
16
17
18
Plaintiff Yak O. Garang brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and
19
383(c)(3), seeking judicial review of the final decision by the Commissioner of Social
20
Security (“Commissioner”), denying Plaintiff an award of disability benefits.
21
The case was referred to Magistrate Judge Linnette C. Kimmins for all pretrial
22
proceedings and report and recommendation in accordance with the provisions of 28
23
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and LRCiv 72.1 and LRCiv 72.2 of the Rules of Practice of the United
24
States District Court for the District of Arizona, Local Rules of Civil Procedure.
25
Magistrate Judge Kimmins, after a thorough review of the record, issued her Report
26
and Recommendation, recommending that the District Court remand this matter for the
27
award of benefits, based the finding that there was no serious doubt as to whether Plaintiff
28
is disabled.
1
The Report and Recommendation provides an in-depth review − and discussion of
2
the Commissioner’s findings and the evidence presented to the Administrative Law Judge
3
− under the applicable standard of review.
4
5
Upon an independent review of the Report and Recommendation, the pleadings, and
the administrative record, the Court agrees with Magistrate Judge Kimmins’ findings.
6
The Report and Recommendation set forth that any party may serve and file written
7
objections within 14 days of being served with a copy of the Report and Recommendation.
8
No objections were filed.
9
Based on the foregoing,
10
IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 23) is hereby
11
ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as the findings of fact and conclusions of law by this Court;
12
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this matter is remanded to the Commissioner
13
14
15
for an award of benefits;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment
accordingly.
16
17
Dated this 28th day of May, 2019.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?