Redgrave v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
ORDER that the Report and Recommendation 22 is accepted and adopted in full. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the matter is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Judge Rosemary Marquez on 7/29/22. (See attached Order for complete details) (JAM)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
No. CV-21-00267-TUC-RM (EJM)
On June 30, 2022, Magistrate Judge Eric J. Markovich issued a Report and
Recommendation (Doc. 22) recommending that this Court remand the above-captioned
matter to the Commissioner of Social Security for further proceedings. No objections to
the Report and Recommendation were filed.
A district judge must “make a de novo determination of those portions” of a
magistrate judge’s “report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which
objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The advisory committee’s notes to Rule
72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure state that, “[w]hen no timely objection is
filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record
in order to accept the recommendation” of a magistrate judge. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)
advisory committee’s note to 1983 addition. See also Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170
F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999) (“If no objection or only partial objection is made, the
district court judge reviews those unobjected portions for clear error.”); Prior v. Ryan,
CV 10-225-TUC-RCC, 2012 WL 1344286, at *1 (D. Ariz. Apr. 18, 2012) (reviewing for
clear error unobjected-to portions of Report and Recommendation).
Recommendation, the parties’ briefs, and the record.
Magistrate Judge Markovich’s Report and Recommendation.
The Court finds no error in
IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 22) is accepted
and adopted in full.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above-captioned matter is remanded to
the Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative proceedings consistent
with the Report and Recommendation. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment
accordingly and close this case.
Dated this 29th day of July, 2022.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?